Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{short description|Fallacy of assumption of causality based on sequence of events}} {{About|the informal fallacy|the West Wing episode|Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc (The West Wing)||Post hoc (disambiguation){{!}}Post hoc}}{{Italic title}} '''''Post hoc ergo propter hoc''''' ([[Latin]]: 'after this, therefore because of this') is an [[informal fallacy]] that states "Since event Y ''followed'' event X, event Y must have been ''caused'' by event X." It is a fallacy in which an event is presumed to have been caused by a closely preceding event merely on the grounds of temporal succession. This type of reasoning is fallacious because mere temporal succession does not establish a causal connection. It is often shortened simply to '''''post hoc fallacy'''''. A [[logical fallacy]] of the [[questionable cause]] variety, it is subtly different from the fallacy ''[[correlation does not imply causation#General pattern|cum hoc ergo propter hoc]]'' ('with this, therefore because of this'), in which two events occur simultaneously or the chronological ordering is insignificant or unknown. Post hoc is a logical fallacy in which one event seems to be the cause of a later event because it occurred earlier.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Grouse|first=Lawrence|title=Post hoc ergo propter hoc|journal=Journal of Thoracic Disease|year=2016|volume=8|issue=7|pages=E511βE512|doi=10.21037/jtd.2016.04.49|issn=2072-1439|pmc=4958779|pmid=27499984 |doi-access=free }}</ref> ''Post hoc'' is a particularly tempting error because correlation sometimes appears to suggest [[causality]]. The fallacy lies in a conclusion based ''solely'' on the order of events, rather than taking into account other factors potentially responsible for the result that might rule out the connection.<ref>{{Cite web|title=post hoc|url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/post_hoc|access-date=2021-08-28|website=LII / Legal Information Institute|language=en}}</ref> A simple example is "The [[Chicken#Crowing|rooster crows]] immediately before [[sunrise]]; therefore the rooster causes the sun to rise."<ref>{{Cite web|date=2015-10-09|title=Correlation vs Causation|url=https://knowledgespace.com.au/correlation-vs-causation/|access-date=2021-08-28|website=KnowledgeSpace|language=en-US}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)