Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Precedent
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Rule established in an earlier legal case}} {{Distinguish|Precedence (disambiguation){{!}}Precedence|President (disambiguation){{!}}President}} {{more citations needed|date=January 2022}} {{Use dmy dates|date=May 2020}} {{Judicial interpretation}} '''Precedent''' is a judicial decision that serves as an authority for courts when deciding subsequent identical or similar cases.<ref>{{Cite web |title=precedent |url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/precedent |access-date=2024-11-27 |website=LII / Legal Information Institute |language=en |quote="Precedent refers to a court decision that is considered an authority for deciding subsequent cases involving identical or similar facts, or similar legal issues. Precedent is incorporated into the doctrine of stare decisis and requires courts to apply the law in the same manner to cases with the same facts."}}</ref><ref name="Civil Law">{{cite web |year=2016 |title=The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions |url=https://www.law.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CommonLawCivilLawTraditions.pdf |url-status= |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241122081109/https://www.law.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/CommonLawCivilLawTraditions.pdf |archive-date=2024-11-22 |access-date=2024-12-04 |publisher=Berkeley Law |quote="Common law is generally uncodified. This means that there is no comprehensive compilation of legal rules and statutes. While common law does rely on some scattered statutes, which are legislative decisions, it is largely based on precedent, meaning the judicial decisions that have already been made in similar cases. These precedents are maintained over time through the records of the courts as well as historically documented in collections of case law known as yearbooks and reports. The precedents to be applied in the decision of each new case are determined by the presiding judge."}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Glossary of Legal Terms {{!}} United States Courts |url=https://www.uscourts.gov/glossary |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241203042635/https://www.uscourts.gov/glossary |archive-date=2024-12-03 |access-date=2024-12-05 |website=www.uscourts.gov |language=en |quote="A court decision in an earlier case with facts and legal issues similar to a dispute currently before a court. Judges will generally 'follow precedent' - meaning that they use the principles established in earlier cases to decide new cases that have similar facts and raise similar legal issues. A judge will disregard precedent if a party can show that the earlier case was wrongly decided, or that it differed in some significant way from the current case."}}</ref> Fundamental to [[common law]] legal systems, precedent operates under the principle of ''stare decisis'' ("to stand by things decided"), where past judicial decisions serve as [[case law]] to guide future rulings, thus promoting consistency and predictability.<ref name="Civil Law" /><ref name=":3">{{Cite web |title=stare decisis |url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/stare_decisis |access-date=2024-11-27 |website=LII / Legal Information Institute |language=en |quote="Stare decisis is the doctrine that courts will adhere to precedent in making their decisions. Stare decisis means "to stand by things decided" in Latin. When a court faces a legal argument, if a previous court has ruled on the same or a closely related issue, then the court will make their decision in alignment with the previous court's decision."}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Understanding Stare Decisis |url=https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/publications/preview_home/understand-stare-decisis/ |access-date=2024-11-27 |website=www.americanbar.org |language=en |quote="Stare Decisis—a Latin term that means 'let the decision stand' or 'to stand by things decided'—is a foundational concept in the American legal system. To put it simply, stare decisis holds that courts and judges should honor 'precedent'—or the decisions, rulings, and opinions from prior cases. Respect for precedents gives the law consistency and makes interpretations of the law more predictable—and less seemingly random."}}</ref> Precedent is a defining feature that sets [[common law]] systems apart from [[Civil law (legal system)|civil law]] systems. In common law, precedent can either be something courts must follow (binding) or something they can consider but do not have to follow (persuasive).<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":8" /> [[Civil law (legal system)|Civil law]] systems, in contrast, are characterized by comprehensive [[Code of law|codes]] and detailed [[statute]]s, with no emphasis on precedent, and where judges primarily focus on fact-finding and applying codified law.<ref>{{Cite web |title=civil law |url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/civil_law |access-date=2024-11-30 |website=LII / Legal Information Institute |language=en |quote="Civil law, as a legal system, refers to a popular way of structuring legal systems around broad codes and detailed statutes that determines the rights and obligations of individuals, without any emphasis on the role of precedent, courts, judges, and juries as in common law countries. Civil law countries typically are characterized by their emphasis on the codified law only with judges playing the main role of finding the facts and applying the law in courts. The civil law system has its roots in the rediscovery of Roman Law in the Middle Ages, with influences from many other legal systems. Today, civil law continues to be the most common legal system in the world."}}</ref> Courts in [[common law]] systems rely heavily on [[case law]], which refers to the collection of precedents and legal principles established by previous judicial decisions on specific issues or topics.<ref>{{Cite web |title=case law |url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/case_law |access-date=2024-12-01 |website=LII / Legal Information Institute |language=en |quote="Case law is law that is based on judicial decisions rather than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case law concerns unique disputes resolved by courts using the concrete facts of a case. By contrast, statutes and regulations are written abstractly. Case law, also used interchangeably with common law, refers to the collection of precedents and authority set by previous judicial decisions on a particular issue or topic."}}</ref> The development of case law depends on the systematic publication and indexing of these decisions in [[law report]]s, making them accessible to lawyers, courts, and the general public.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |title=Law report {{!}} Common Law Cases & Judgments {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/law-report |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240724164729/https://www.britannica.com/topic/law-report |archive-date=2024-07-24 |access-date=2024-12-01 |website=www.britannica.com |language=en |quote=Law report, in common law, published record of a judicial decision that is cited by lawyers and judges for their use as precedent in subsequent cases. The report of a decision ordinarily contains the title of the case, a statement of the facts giving rise to the litigation, and its history in the courts. It then reproduces the opinion of the court and concludes with the court's judgment—affirming or reversing the judgment of the court below. The report of a modern decision is usually preceded by an analytic summary of the opinion, called a headnote, that states the points decided.}}</ref> Generally speaking, a legal precedent may be: * '''applied''' (if precedent is binding) / '''adopted''' (if precedent is persuasive), if the principles underpinning the previous decision are accordingly used to evaluate the issues of the subsequent case; * '''[[Distinguishing|distinguished]]''', if the principles underpinning the previous decision are found specific to, or premised upon, certain factual scenarios, and not applied to the subsequent case because of the absence or material difference in the latter's facts; * '''modified''', if the same court on determination of the same case on order from a higher court modified one or more parts of the previous decision; or * '''overruled''', if the same or higher courts on appeal or determination of subsequent cases found the principles underpinning the previous decision erroneous in law or overtaken by new legislation or developments.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)