Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Presumption
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{short description|In law, an inference of a particular fact}} {{for|the term in Catholic canon law|Presumption (Catholic canon law)}} {{Use dmy dates|date=August 2021}} In [[law]], a '''presumption''' is an "[[inference]] of a particular [[fact]]".<ref name="Black's Law">{{cite encyclopedia |title=Presumption|encyclopedia=[[Black's Law Dictionary]]|year= 1990 |last=Black |first=Henry Campbell|author-link=Henry Campbell Black|url=https://blacks_law.en-academic.com/38069}}</ref> There are two types of presumptions: rebuttable presumptions and irrebuttable (or conclusive) presumptions.<ref>{{cite journal|url=https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2290&context=clr|first=Otis H.|last=Fisk|journal=The Cornell Law Quarterly|volume=11|pages=20β40|date=1925|title=Presumptions}}</ref>{{rp|25}} A rebuttable presumption will either shift the [[burden of production]] (requiring the disadvantaged party to produce some [[Evidence (law)|evidence]] to the contrary) or the [[burden of proof (law)|burden of proof]] (requiring the disadvantaged party to show the presumption is wrong);<ref name="Black's Law"/> in short, a [[Trier of fact|fact finder]] can reject a rebuttable presumption based on other evidence.<ref name="Rogus">{{cite journal|url=https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=mjgl|first=Caroline|last=Rogus|title=Fighting the Establishment: The Need for Procedural Reform of Our Paternity Laws|volume=21|date=2014|pages=67β122|journal=Michigan Journal of Gender & Law|issue=1 |doi=10.36641/mjgl.21.1.fighting |s2cid=152740413 |doi-access=free|url-access=subscription}}</ref>{{rp|87}} Conversely, a conclusive/irrebuttable presumption cannot be challenged by contradictory facts or evidence.<ref name="Rogus"/>{{rp|87β88}} Sometimes, a presumption must be triggered by a predicate factβthat is, the fact must be found before the presumption applies.<ref name="Hall">{{cite journal|first=Keith B.|last=Hall|journal=Tulane Law Review|url=https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1144&context=faculty_scholarship|title=Evidentiary Presumptions|pages=1321β28|volume=72|date=1998}}</ref>{{rp|1321β22}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)