Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Princely state
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Indian vassal states under the British Raj}} {{About|states ruled by princes in the former British Raj of India and current Republic of India|the global concept|Principality}} {{Colonial India}} {{Princely states of India topics}} {{Use dmy dates|date=September 2016}} {{Use Indian English|date=June 2016}} A '''princely state''' (also called '''native state''') was semi-independent and a nominally sovereign<ref>{{Harvnb|Ramusack|2004|pp=85}} '''Quote:''' "The British did not create the Indian princes. Before and during the European penetration of India, indigenous rulers achieved dominance through the military protection they provided to dependents and their skill in acquiring revenues to maintain their military and administrative organizations. Major Indian rulers exercised varying degrees and types of sovereign powers before they entered treaty relations with the British. What changed during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries is that the British increasingly restricted the sovereignty of Indian rulers. The [[East India Company|Indian Company]] set boundaries; it extracted resources in the form of military personnel, subsidies or tribute payments, and the purchase of commercial goods at favorable prices, and limited opportunities for other alliances. From the 1810s onwards as the British expanded and consolidated their power, their centralized military despotism dramatically reduced the political options of Indian rulers." (p. 85)</ref> entity of [[British Raj]] that was not directly governed by the British, but rather by an indigenous ruler under a form of [[indirect rule]],<ref>{{Harvnb|Ramusack|2004|p=87}} '''Quote:''' "The British system of indirect rule over Indian states ... provided a model for the efficient use of scarce monetary and personnel resources that could be adopted to imperial acquisitions in Malaya and Africa."</ref> subject to a [[subsidiary alliance]] and the [[suzerainty]] or [[Suzerainty#British paramountcy|paramountcy]] of the [[the Crown|British Crown]]. At the time of the British withdrawal, 565 princely states were officially recognized in the Indian Subcontinent,<ref>{{Cite book |last=Bhargava |first=R. P. |title=The Chamber of Princes |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BAQgNE1uSEgC&pg=PA313 |year=1991 |publisher=Northern Book Centre |isbn=978-81-7211-005-5 |pages=312β323}}</ref> apart from thousands of [[zamindar|zamindari estates]] and [[jagir]]s. In 1947, princely states covered 40% of the area of pre-independence India and constituted 23% of its population.{{citation needed|date=March 2025}} The most important princely states had their own Indian political residencies: [[Hyderabad State|Hyderabad]] of the [[Nizam]]s, [[Kingdom of Mysore|Mysore]], [[Pudukkottai State|Pudukkottai]] and [[Travancore State|Travancore]] in the South, [[Jammu and Kashmir (princely state)|Jammu and Kashmir]] and [[Gwalior]] in North and [[Indore State|Indore]] in Central India. The most prominent among those β roughly a quarter of the total β had the status of a [[salute state]], one whose ruler was entitled to a set number of [[gun salute]]s on ceremonial occasions.{{citation needed|date=August 2024}} The princely states varied greatly in status, size, and wealth; the premier 21-gun salute states of Hyderabad and Jammu and Kashmir were each over {{Convert|200000|km2||abbr=on}} in size. In 1941, Hyderabad had a population of over 16 million, while Jammu and Kashmir had a population of slightly over 4 million. At the other end of the scale, the non-salute principality of [[Lawa Thikana|Lawa]] covered an area of {{Convert|49|km2||abbr=on}}, with a population of just below 3,000. Some two hundred of the lesser states even had an area of less than {{Convert|25|km2||0|abbr=on}}.<ref name="Markovits2004">{{cite book|author=Markovits, Claude |title=A history of modern India, 1480β1950|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uzOmy2y0Zh4C|year=2004|publisher=Anthem Press|pages=386β409|isbn=978-1-84331-004-4}}</ref><ref name="scale">{{cite book|pages=33β37|title=The India Office and Burma Office List: 1945|publisher=Harrison & Sons, Ltd.|year=1945}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)