Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Proxy fight
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Shareholder contest for company control}} {{distinguish|proxy war}} A '''proxy fight''', '''proxy contest''' or '''proxy battle''' is an unfriendly contest for control over an organization. The event usually occurs when a corporation's stockholders develop opposition to some aspect of the corporate governance, often focusing on directorial and management positions. Corporate activists may attempt to persuade shareholders to use their [[Proxy voting|proxy votes]] (i.e., votes by one individual or institution as the authorized representative of another) to install new management for any of a variety of reasons. Shareholders of a public corporation may appoint an [[Proxy firm|agent]] to attend shareholder meetings and vote on their behalf. That agent is the shareholder's proxy.<ref>Klein, Ramseyer, and Bainbridge. Business Associations: Cases and Materials on Agency, Partnerships, and Corporations. (7th Ed.) Foundation Press.</ref> In a proxy fight, [[Incumbent#In business|incumbent]] directors and management have the odds stacked in their favor over those trying to force the corporate change.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Webber |first1=David H. |author-link=David H. Webber |title=The Rise of the Working-Class Shareholder: Labor's Last Best Weapon |date=April 2018 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-91946-4 |pages=46β47 |url=https://www.degruyter.com/viewbooktoc/product/511375 |access-date=15 November 2019 |url-access=subscription}}</ref> These incumbents use various corporate governance tactics to stay in power, including: staggering the boards (i.e., having different election years for different directors), controlling access to the corporation's money, and creating restrictive requirements in the [[bylaws]]. As a result, most proxy fights are unsuccessful; except those waged more recently by [[hedge fund]]s, which are successful more than 60% of the time.<ref>{{cite journal | url=http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01432.x/full.html | doi=10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01432.x | title=Entrepreneurial Shareholder Activism: Hedge Funds and Other Private Investors | date=2009 | last1=Klein | first1=April | last2=Zur | first2=Emanuel | journal=The Journal of Finance | volume=64 | pages=187β229 }}</ref> However, previous studies have found that proxy fights are positively correlated with an increase in shareholder wealth.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Hirst|first1=Scott|last2=Bebchuk|first2=Lucian|date=2010-01-01|title=Private Ordering and the Proxy Access Debate|url=https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/338|journal=The Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper Series|number=653}}</ref>'''{{rp|8}}'''
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)