Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Roman commerce
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Major sector of the Roman economy}} {{Original research|date=July 2023|reason=There is lots of prose throughout the article without any citation.}}[[File:Ménade danzante, Casa del Naviglio, Pompeya.jpg|thumb|A Roman fresco from [[Pompeii]], 1st century AD, depicting a [[Maenad]] in [[History of silk|silk dress]], [[Naples National Archaeological Museum]]; silks came from the [[Han dynasty]] of China along the [[Silk Road]], a valuable trade commodity in the Roman empire, whereas [[Roman glass]]wares made their way [[Sino-Roman relations|to Han China]] via land [[Indo-Roman trade relations|and sea]].<ref>An, Jiayao. (2002), "When Glass Was Treasured in China," in Annette L. Juliano and Judith A. Lerner (eds), ''Silk Road Studies VII: Nomads, Traders, and Holy Men Along China's Silk Road'', 79–94, Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, {{ISBN|2503521789}}, pp 83-84.</ref>]] '''Roman commerce''' was a major sector of the [[Roman economy]] during the later generations of the [[Roman Republic|Republic]] and throughout most of the [[Roman Empire|imperial period]]. Fashions and trends in [[historiography]] and in popular culture have tended to neglect the economic basis of the empire in favor of the [[lingua franca]] of [[Latin]] and the exploits of the [[Roman legions]].{{Citation needed|date=July 2023}} The language and the legions were supported by trade and were part of its backbone. The Romans were businessmen, and the longevity of their empire was caused by their commercial [[trade]].{{Citation needed|date=July 2023}} Whereas in theory members of the [[Roman Senate]] and their sons were restricted when engaging in trade,<ref>Livy, ''The History of Rome'' [http://etext.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=Liv3His.sgm&images=images/modeng&data=/texts/english/modeng/parsed&tag=public&part=63&division=div2 21.63] {{dead link|date=July 2016}}</ref> the members of the [[equestrian (Roman)|equestrian]] order were involved in businesses despite their upper-class values, which laid the emphasis on military pursuits and leisure activities. [[Plebs|Plebeians]] and freedmen held shop or manned stalls at markets, and vast numbers of [[slavery in ancient Rome|slaves]] did most of the hard work. The slaves were themselves also the subject of commercial transactions. Probably because of their high proportion in society compared to that in [[Classical Greece]], the reality of runaways, and the [[Servile Wars]] and minor uprisings, they gave a distinct flavor to Roman commerce.{{Citation needed|date=July 2023}} The intricate, complex, and extensive accounting of Roman trade was conducted with counting boards and the [[Roman abacus]]. The abacus, which used [[Roman numerals]], was ideally suited to the counting of [[Roman currency]] and tallying of [[ancient Roman units of measurement|Roman measures]].{{Citation needed|date=July 2023}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)