Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Scientific skepticism
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{short description|Questioning of claims lacking empirical evidence}} {{for|a general discussion of skepticism|Skepticism}} {{Use American English|date=April 2021}} {{Use mdy dates|date=April 2021}} [[File:Five Fellows CSI 2018.jpg|thumb|Five Fellows of [[Committee for Skeptical Inquiry]] in 2018]] '''Scientific skepticism''' or '''rational skepticism''' (also spelled '''scepticism'''), sometimes referred to as '''skeptical inquiry''',<ref name="KendrickInquiry">{{cite web|last1=Frazier|first1=Kendrick|author-link1=Kendrick Frazier|date=1 November 2013|title=Why We Do This: Revisiting the Higher Values of Skeptical Inquiry|url=https://www.csicop.org/si/show/why_we_do_this_revisiting_the_higher_values_of_skeptical_inquiry|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170610192458/http://www.csicop.org/si/show/why_we_do_this_revisiting_the_higher_values_of_skeptical_inquiry|archive-date=10 June 2017|access-date=12 November 2018|website=csicop.org}}</ref> is a position in which one questions the veracity of claims lacking [[scientific evidence]]. In practice, the term most commonly refers to the examination of claims and theories that appear to be [[Pseudoscience|unscientific]], rather than the routine discussions and challenges among scientists. Scientific skepticism differs from [[philosophical skepticism]], which questions humans' ability to claim any knowledge about the nature of the world and how they perceive it, and the similar but distinct [[Cartesian doubt|methodological skepticism]], which is a systematic process of being skeptical about (or doubting) the truth of one's beliefs.<ref name="Merton">{{cite book|last=Merton|first=R. K.|title=The Normative Structure of Science|year=1942}} in {{cite book|last=Merton|first=Robert King|url=https://archive.org/details/sociologyofscien0000mert|title=The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations|publisher=[[University of Chicago Press]]|year=1973|isbn=978-0-226-52091-9|location=Chicago|author-link=Robert K. Merton|url-access=registration}}</ref> The '''skeptical movement''' ([[American and British English spelling differences#Miscellaneous spelling differences|British spelling]]: '''sceptical movement''') is a contemporary [[social movement]] based on the idea of scientific skepticism. The movement has the goal of investigating claims made on [[fringe science|fringe topics]] and determining whether they are supported by [[empirical research]] and are [[reproducibility|reproducible]], as part of a methodological norm pursuing "the extension of certified knowledge".<ref>{{citation|last=Stemwedel|first=Janet D.|title=Basic concepts: the norms of science|date=2008-01-29|url=http://scienceblogs.com/ethicsandscience/2008/01/29/basic-concepts-the-norms-of-sc|work=ScienceBlogs: Adventures in Ethics and Science|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130512231940/http://scienceblogs.com/ethicsandscience/2008/01/29/basic-concepts-the-norms-of-sc/|publisher=[[ScienceBlogs]]|format=blog|archive-date=2013-05-12|url-status=live}}: quoting [[Robert K. Merton|Merton, R. K.]] (1942)</ref> Roots of the movement date at least from the 19th century, when people started publicly raising questions regarding the unquestioned acceptance of claims about [[Kardecist spiritism|spiritism]], of various widely held [[superstition]]s, and of [[pseudoscience]].<ref> Asbjørn Dyrendal: "Oh no it isn't!" Skeptics and the Rhetorical Use of Science in Religion. in Olav Hammer & James R. Lewis (red.) ''Handbook of'' ''Religion and the Authority of Science''. pp. 879–900. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers 2010, Dyrendal refers to spiritualists as early targets of skeptics based on Hammer 2007. </ref><ref> Loxton, 2013, pp. 10ff. </ref> Publications such as those of the Dutch [[Vereniging tegen de Kwakzalverij]] (1881) also targeted [[medical quackery]]. Using as a template the Belgian organization founded in 1949, [[Comité Para]], Americans [[Paul Kurtz]] and [[Marcello Truzzi]] founded the [[Committee for Skeptical Inquiry|Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP)]], in [[Amherst, New York]], in 1976. Now known as the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI), this organization has inspired others to form similar groups worldwide.<ref name=Hammer/>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)