Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Straw man
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Form of incorrect argument and informal fallacy}} {{Use dmy dates|date=July 2020}} {{Other uses}} [[File: McKinley Destroys Imperialism Straw Man.jpg|thumb|upright=1.3|U.S. president [[William McKinley]] has shot a cannon (labeled McKinley's Letter) that has involved a "straw man" and its constructors ([[Carl Schurz]], [[Oswald Garrison Villard]], [[Richard Olney]]) in a great explosion. Caption: "SMASHED!", ''[[Harper's Weekly]]'', 22 September 1900]] A '''straw man''' fallacy (sometimes written as '''strawman''') is the [[informal fallacy]] of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.<ref name="Stephen Downes">{{cite web |url=http://web.uvic.ca/psyc/skelton/Teaching/General%20Readings/Logical%20Falllacies.htm#_Toc495459590 |author=Downes, Stephen |title=The Logical Fallacies |access-date=25 February 2016 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303181716/http://web.uvic.ca/psyc/skelton/Teaching/General%20Readings/Logical%20Falllacies.htm#_Toc495459590 |archive-date=3 March 2016 }}</ref> One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man". The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition through the covert replacement of it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and the subsequent refutation of that false argument ("knock down a straw man"), instead of the opponent's proposition.<ref name="book">{{cite book |last=Pirie |first=Madsen |author-link=Madsen Pirie |title=How to Win Every Argument: The Use and Abuse of Logic |year=2007 |publisher=[[Continuum International Publishing Group]] |location=UK |isbn=978-0-8264-9894-6 |pages=155β157 }}</ref><ref name="files">{{cite web |url=http://www.fallacyfiles.org/strawman.html |title=The Straw Man Fallacy |work=fallacyfiles.org |access-date=12 October 2007 }}</ref> Straw man arguments have been used throughout history in [[polemic|polemical debate]], particularly regarding highly charged emotional subjects.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Demir |first1=Yeliz |title=Derailment of strategic maneuvering in a multi-participant TV debate: The fallacy of [[ignoratio elenchi]]|journal=Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi |date=2018 |volume=15 |issue=1 |page=25β58}}</ref> Straw man tactics in the United Kingdom may also be known as an [[Aunt Sally#Language|Aunt Sally]], after a pub game of the same name, where patrons throw sticks or battens at a post to knock off a [[Glossary of cue sports terms#skittle|skittle]] balanced on top.<ref name="Lindley2006">{{Cite book |last=Lindley |first=Dennis V.|author-link=Dennis Lindley|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z0ArJ_CDnssC&pg=PA80 |title=Understanding Uncertainty |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-470-04383-7 |page=80|access-date=25 February 2016}}</ref><ref name="Sparkes1991">{{cite book|author=A. W. Sparkes|title=Talking Philosophy: A Wordbook|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2NkOAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA104|year=1991|publisher=[[Routledge]]|isbn=978-0-415-04223-9|page=104|access-date=25 February 2016}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)