Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Textus Roffensis
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Mediaeval manuscript}} {{hatnote|The 'Annals of Rochester' redirects here. For other works known by that name, see [[Annals of Rochester (disambiguation)]].}} {{Use dmy dates|date=April 2022}} [[Image:Law of Æthelberht.jpg|thumb|275px|right|First page of the {{Lang|la|Textus Roffensis}}. From Rochester Cathedral Library, MS A.3.5; formerly in the Medway Studies Centre, now in the crypt of [[Rochester Cathedral]].]] {{Italic title}} The '''{{Lang|la|Textus Roffensis}}''' ([[Latin]] for "The Tome of [[Rochester Cathedral|Rochester]]"), fully titled the '''''Textus de Ecclesia Roffensi per Ernulphum episcopum''''' ("The Tome of the [[Rochester Cathedral|Church of Rochester]] up to [[Ernulf|Bishop Ernulf]]") and sometimes also known as the '''Annals of Rochester''', is a mediaeval [[manuscript]] that consists of two separate works written between 1122 and 1124. It is catalogued as "Rochester Cathedral Library, MS A.3.5" and {{as of|2023|lc=y}}<ref>{{cite web|author=Olley Design|title=Textus Roffensis|url=https://www.rochestercathedral.org/textus|access-date=28 June 2023|website=Rochester Cathedral}}</ref> is currently on display in a new exhibition at [[Rochester Cathedral]] in [[Rochester, Kent]].<ref>It was deposited in the [[Centre for Kentish Studies|Kent Archives Office]] in [[Maidstone]] in 1969, and was transferred to the Medway office in 1992 following its creation.</ref> It is thought that the main text of both manuscripts was written by a single [[scribe]], although the English glosses to the two [[Latin]] entries (items 23 and 24 in table below) were made by a second hand.<ref>Treharne, ''Textus Roffensis''.</ref> The annotations might indicate that the manuscript was consulted in some post-Conquest trials.<ref>Nicholas Kar, 'Information and Its Retrieval' in Julia Crick and [[Elisabeth van Houts]] (eds.), ''A Social History of England, 900-–1200'', 375</ref> However, the glosses are very sparse and just clarify a few uncertain terms. For example, the entry on f. 67r merely explains that the {{lang|la|triplex iudiciu(m)}} is called in English, ''ofraceth ordel'' (insult ordeal = triple ordeal). There is a clear, digitised version in the [[Rylands Library|Rylands]] Medieval Collection.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://enriqueta.man.ac.uk/luna/servlet/detail/Man4MedievalVC~4~4~990378~142729?qvq=q:=Textus+Roffensis+&mi=0&trs=2|title=Manchester Digital|website=enriqueta.man.ac.uk|access-date=28 July 2018}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)