Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Theistic science
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Intelligent Design}} '''Theistic science''', also referred to as '''theistic realism''',<ref name=Dembski>{{cite book | last = Dembski | first = William | author-link = William A. Dembski | title = Mere Creation | publisher = InterVarsity Press | location = Downers Grove | year = 1998 | isbn = 0-8308-1515-5 |page=315}}</ref> is the [[pseudoscientific]] proposal that the central [[scientific method]] of requiring [[testability]], known as [[methodological naturalism]], should be replaced by a [[philosophy of science]] that allows occasional [[supernatural]] explanations which are inherently untestable.<ref name="NCSE Psci 2003">{{cite web |first=Eugenie C. |last=Scott |author-link=Eugenie Scott | title=My Favorite Pseudoscience | website=NCSE | url=https://ncse.com/library-resource/my-favorite-pseudoscience |year=2003 | access-date=4 October 2017}}</ref><ref name=Stenmark187/> Proponents propose supernatural explanations for topics raised by their theology, in particular evolution.<ref name="S&RM">[[Eugenie Scott|Scott, Eugenie C.]] "The 'science and religion movement': an opportunity for improved public understanding of science?", in {{cite book | last = Kurtz | first = Paul | title = Science and Religion | publisher = Prometheus Books | location = Buffalo | year = 2003 | isbn = 1-59102-064-6 | page = [https://archive.org/details/sciencereligiona00kurt/page/104 104] | url = https://archive.org/details/sciencereligiona00kurt/page/104 }}</ref> Supporters of theistic realism or theistic science include [[intelligent design]] creationism proponents [[J. P. Moreland]], [[Stephen C. Meyer]]<ref name=VanTil>{{cite journal | title = Special Creationism in Designer Clothing: A Response to The Creation Hypothesis | journal = [[Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith]] | date = June 1995 | first = Howard | last = Van Till |author-link=Howard J. Van Till | volume = 47 | issue = 123 | url = http://www.asa3.org/ASA/PSCF/1995/PSCF6-95VanTill.html | access-date = 2011-01-21}}</ref><ref name="ncse 18">{{Cite web | last = Scott | first = Eugenie C. | title = Reports of the National Center for Science Education 18 (2) | url = http://ncse.com/book/export/html/2410 | publisher = [[National Center for Science Education]] | year = 1998 | access-date = 11 March 2012 }}</ref> and [[Phillip E. Johnson]].<ref name=Dembski/> Instead of the [[relationship between religion and science]] being a dialogue, theistic science seeks to allow exceptions to the basic methods of science, and present miraculous interventions as a scientific explanation when a natural explanation has not been found. As [[Alvin Plantinga]] acknowledges, this is a "science stopper",<ref name="NCSE">{{cite web | last = Scott | first = Eugenie C. | title="Science and Religion", "Christian Scholarship", and "Theistic Science" | website=NCSE |year=1998 | url=https://ncse.com/library-resource/science-religion-christian-scholarship-theistic-science | access-date=5 October 2017}}</ref> and these concepts lack any mainstream credence.<ref name="S&RM" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)