Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Tort
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Legal claim of civil wrong}} {{distinguish|tart|torte|torta}} {{Use dmy dates|date=June 2021}} {{Tort law}} A '''tort''' is a [[civil wrong]], other than breach of contract, that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in [[legal liability]] for the person who commits the tortious act.<ref>[[Glanville Williams]], ... providing grounds for lawsuit. ''Learning the Law''. Eleventh Edition. Stevens. 1982. p. 9.</ref> Tort law can be contrasted with [[criminal law]], which deals with [[crime|criminal wrongs]] that are punishable by the state. While criminal law aims to punish individuals who commit crimes, tort law aims to compensate individuals who suffer harm as a result of the actions of others.<ref name=":2">{{Cite book |last=Hughes-Davies and Nathan Tamblyn |first=Timon |title='Tort Law' |publisher=Routledge |year=2020 |isbn=9781138554597 |location=Oxon |pages=1–19}}</ref>{{efn|According to [[Tom Bingham, Baron Bingham of Cornhill|Lord Bingham]] in a landmark English tort case, 'The overall object of tort law is to define cases in which the law may justly hold one party liable to compensate another.'<ref>Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22, Lord Bingham</ref>}} Some wrongful acts, such as [[assault]] and [[Battery (crime)|battery]], can result in both a civil lawsuit and a criminal prosecution in countries where the civil and criminal legal systems are separate. Tort law may also be contrasted with [[contract law]], which provides civil remedies after breach of a duty that arises from a contract. Obligations in both tort and criminal law are more fundamental and are imposed regardless of whether the parties have a contract. While tort law in [[civil law (legal system)|civil law jurisdictions]] largely derives from [[Roman law]], [[common law]] jurisdictions derive their tort law from customary [[English tort law]]. In civil law jurisdictions based on civil codes, both contractual and tortious or delictual liability is typically outlined in a civil code based on Roman Law principles. Tort law is referred to as the law of delict in [[Scots law|Scots]] and [[Roman-Dutch law|Roman Dutch law]], and resembles tort law in common law jurisdictions in that rules regarding civil liability are established primarily by precedent and theory rather than an exhaustive code. However, like other civil law jurisdictions, the underlying principles are drawn from Roman law. A handful of jurisdictions have codified a mixture of common and civil law jurisprudence either due to their colonial past (e.g. [[Quebec|Québec]], [[Saint Lucia|St Lucia]], [[Mauritius]]) or due to influence from multiple legal traditions when their civil codes were drafted (e.g. [[Mainland China]], the [[Philippines]], and [[Thailand]]). Furthermore, Israel essentially codifies common law provisions on tort.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)