Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Transitive verb
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Verb that entails a transitive object}} {{Refimprove|date=June 2014}} {{Transitivity and Valency}} A '''transitive verb''' is a [[verb]] that entails one or more [[object (grammar)|transitive objects]], for example, 'enjoys' in ''Amadeus enjoys music''. This contrasts with [[intransitive verb]]s, which do not entail transitive objects, for example, 'arose' in ''Beatrice arose''. [[Transitivity (grammar)|Transitivity]] is traditionally thought of as a global property of a clause, by which activity is transferred from an [[agent (grammar)|agent]] to a [[patient (grammar)|patient]].<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Hopper|first1=Paul J|last2=Thompson|first2=Sandra A|title=Transitivity in grammar and discourse|journal=Language|date=June 1980|volume=56|issue=2|pages=251–299|url=http://latina.phil2.uni-freiburg.de/raible/Lehre/2006/Materialien/Hopper_Thompson.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070627234224/http://latina.phil2.uni-freiburg.de/raible/Lehre/2006/Materialien/Hopper_Thompson.pdf |archive-date=2007-06-27 |url-status=live|access-date=24 January 2016|doi=10.1353/lan.1980.0017|s2cid=144215256}}</ref> Transitive verbs can be classified by the number of objects they require. Verbs that entail only two [[Argument (linguistics)|arguments]], a [[subject (grammar)|subject]] and a single [[direct object]], are monotransitive. Verbs that entail two objects, a direct object and an indirect object, are ''[[ditransitive verb|ditransitive]]'',<ref>{{cite book|last1=Kempen|first1=Gerard|last2=Harbusch|first2=Karin|editor=Thomas Pechmann |editor2=Christopher Habel|title=Multidisciplinary Approaches to Language Production|year=2004|publisher=Walter de Gruyter|isbn=978-3-11-017840-1|pages=173–181|chapter=A corpus study into word order variation in German subordinate clauses: Animacy affects linearization independently of grammatical function assignment|quote=We distinguish two types of transitive clauses: those including only [a subject–direct object] pair are ''monotransitive''; clauses containing [subject, direct object, and indirect object] are ''ditransitive''.}}</ref> or less commonly ''bitransitive''.<ref>{{cite book|last=Maslova|first=Elena|editor=Vladimir P. Nedjilkov|title=Reciprocal Constructions, Volume 1|year=2007|publisher=John Benjamins Publishing|isbn=978-90-272-2983-0|pages=1835–1863|chapter=Reciprocals in Yukaghir languages}}</ref> An example of a ditransitive verb in English is the verb ''to give'', which may feature a subject, an indirect object, and a direct object: ''John gave Mary the book''. Verbs that take three objects are ''tritransitive''.<ref>{{cite journal | author =Kittila, Seppo | title=A typology of tritransitives: alignment types and motivations | journal=Linguistics | volume=45 | issue=3 | year=2007 | publisher=Walter de Gruyter| location=Germany | pages=453–508 | doi = 10.1515/LING.2007.015| hdl=10138/136282 | s2cid=53133279 | hdl-access=free }}</ref> In English a tritransitive verb features an indirect object, a direct object, and a [[prepositional phrase]] – as in ''I'll trade you this bicycle for your binoculars'' – or else a [[clause]] that behaves like an argument – as in ''I bet you a pound that he has forgotten''.<ref>{{cite book|last=Mita|first=Ryohei|editor=J. Askedal |editor2=I. Roberts |editor3=T. Matsuchita |editor4=H. Hasegawa|title=Germanic Languages and Linguistic Universals|year=2009|publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company|isbn=978-90-272-8768-7|pages=121–142|chapter=On tritransitive verbs}}</ref> Not all [[descriptive grammar]]s recognize tritransitive verbs.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Narasimhan |first1=Bhuvana |last2=Eisenbeiß |first2=Sonja |last3=Brown |first3=Penelope |title='Two's company, more is a crowd': the linguistic encoding of multiple-participant events |journal=Linguistics |year=2007 |volume=45 |issue=3 |doi=10.1515/LING.2007.013|s2cid=55658350 |url=http://repository.essex.ac.uk/11509/1/0c9605229ce53af0ac000000.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180720014711/http://repository.essex.ac.uk/11509/1/0c9605229ce53af0ac000000.pdf |archive-date=2018-07-20 |url-status=live }}</ref> A [[clause]] with a prepositional phrase that expresses a meaning similar to that usually expressed by an object may be called ''pseudo-transitive''. For example, the [[Indonesian language|Indonesian]] sentences ''Dia masuk sekolah'' ("He attended school") and ''Dia masuk ke sekolah'' ("He went into the school") have the same verb (''masuk'' "enter"), but the first sentence has a direct object while the second has a prepositional phrase in its place.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Stevens |first=Alan |year=1970 |title=Pseudo-transitive verbs in Indonesian |journal=Indonesia |volume=9 |issue=9 |pages=67–72 |doi=10.2307/3350622|jstor=3350622 |hdl=1813/53485 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> A clause with a direct object plus a prepositional phrase may be called ''pseudo-ditransitive'', as in the [[Lakhota language|Lakhota]] sentence ''Haŋpíkčeka kiŋ lená wé-čage'' ("I made those moccasins for him").<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Esteban |first=Avelino Corral |year=2012 |title=A comparative analysis of three-place predicates in Lakhota within the RRG framework |journal=Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics |volume=25 |pages=9–26}}</ref> Such constructions are sometimes called ''complex transitive''. The category of complex transitives includes not only prepositional phrases but also [[dependent clause]]s, [[Apposition|appositives]], and other structures.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Hampe |first=Beate |year=2011 |title=Discovering constructions by means of collostruction analysis: The English denominative construction |journal=Cognitive Linguistics |volume=22 |issue=2 |pages=211–245 |doi=10.1515/cogl.2011.009|s2cid=147402733 }}</ref> There is some controversy regarding complex transitives and tritransitives; linguists disagree on the nature of the structures. In contrast to transitive verbs, some verbs take zero objects. Verbs that do not require an object are called [[intransitive verb]]s. An example in modern English is the verb ''to arrive''. Verbs that can be used in an intransitive or transitive way are called ''[[ambitransitive verb]]s''. In English, an example is the verb ''to eat''; the sentences ''You eat'' (with an intransitive form) and ''You eat apples'' (a transitive form that has ''apples'' as the object) are both grammatical. The concept of [[Valency (linguistics)|valency]] is related to [[Transitivity (grammar)|transitivity]]. The valency of a verb considers all the arguments the verb takes, including both the subject and all of the objects. In contrast to valency, the transitivity of a verb only considers the objects. [[Subcategorization]] is roughly [[synonym]]ous with valency, though they come from different theoretical traditions.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)