Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Tritone paradox
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Auditory illusion}} __NOTOC__ [[Image:Tritone_paradox_example.jpg|thumb|right|240px]] The '''tritone paradox''' is an [[auditory illusion]] in which a sequentially played pair of [[Shepard tone]]s<ref>R. N. Shepard. "Circularity in judgments of relative pitch". ''Journal of the Acoustical Society of America'', 36(12):2346β2353, 1964.</ref> separated by an [[interval (music)|interval]] of a [[tritone]], or half octave, is heard as ascending by some people and as descending by others.<ref>Deutsch, D. "A musical paradox". ''Music Perception'', 3:275β280, 1986.</ref> Different populations tend to favor one of a limited set of different spots around the [[chromatic circle]] as central to the set of "higher" tones. [[Roger Shepard]] in 1963 had argued that such tone pairs would be heard ambiguously as either ascending or descending. However, [[music psychology|psychology of music]] researcher [[Diana Deutsch]] in 1986 discovered that when the judgments of individual listeners were considered separately, their judgments depended on the positions of the tones along the [[chromatic circle]]. For example, one listener would hear the tone pair CβF{{music|sharp}} as ascending and the tone pair GβC{{music|sharp}} as descending. Yet another listener would hear the tone pair CβF{{music|sharp}} as descending and the tone pair GβC{{music|sharp}} as ascending. Furthermore, the way these tone pairs were perceived varied depending on the listener's language or dialect. Each Shepard tone consists of a set of octave-related sinusoids, whose amplitudes are scaled by a fixed bell-shaped spectral envelope based on a log frequency scale. For example, one tone might consist of a sinusoid at 440 Hz, accompanied by sinusoid at the higher octaves (880 Hz, 1760 Hz, etc.) and lower octaves (220 Hz, 110 Hz, etc.). The other tone might consist of a 311 Hz sinusoid, again accompanied by higher and lower octaves (622 Hz, 155.5 Hz, etc.). The amplitudes of the sinusoids of both complexes are determined by the same fixed-amplitude envelope—for example, the envelope might be centered at 370 Hz and span a six-octave range. Shepard predicted that the two tones would constitute a bistable figure, the auditory equivalent of the [[Necker cube]], that could be heard ascending or descending, but never both at the same time. Diana Deutsch later found that perception of which tone was higher depended on the absolute frequencies involved: an individual will usually find the same tone to be higher, and this is determined by the tones' absolute pitches. This is consistently done by a large portion of the population, despite the fact that responding to different tones in different ways must involve the ability to hear [[absolute pitch]], which was thought to be rare. This finding has been used to argue that latent absolute-pitch ability is present in a large proportion of the population. In addition, Deutsch found that subjects from the south of England and from California resolved the ambiguity the opposite way.<ref>Deutsch, D. "The tritone paradox: An influence of language on music perception". ''Music Perception'', 8:335β347, 1991.</ref> Also, Deutsch, Henthorn and Dolson found that native speakers of [[Vietnamese language|Vietnamese]], a [[Tone (linguistics)|tonal]] language, heard the tritone paradox differently from Californians who were native speakers of English.<ref>Deutsch, D., Henthorn T. and Dolson, M. "Speech patterns heard early in life influence later perception of the tritone paradox". ''Music Perception'', 21:357β372, 2004.</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)