Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Weierstrass function
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{short description|Function that is continuous everywhere but differentiable nowhere}} {{distinguish|text=the [[Weierstrass elliptic function]] (<math>\wp</math>) or the [[Weierstrass functions|Weierstrass sigma, zeta, or eta functions]]}} {{Use dmy dates|date=September 2020}} [[Image:WeierstrassFunction.svg|300px|thumb|Plot of Weierstrass function over the interval [−2, 2]. Like some other [[fractal]]s, the function exhibits [[self-similarity]]: every zoom (red circle) is similar to the global plot.]] In [[mathematics]], the '''Weierstrass function''', named after its discoverer, [[Karl Weierstrass]], is an example of a real-valued [[function (mathematics)|function]] that is [[continuous function|continuous]] everywhere but [[Differentiable function|differentiable]] nowhere. It is also an example of a [[fractal curve]]. The Weierstrass function has historically served the role of a [[pathological (mathematics)|pathological]] function, being the first published example (1872) specifically concocted to challenge the notion that every continuous function is differentiable except on a set of isolated points.<ref>At least two researchers formulated continuous, nowhere differentiable functions before Weierstrass, but their findings were not published in their lifetimes. Around 1831, [[Bernard Bolzano]] (1781–1848), a Czech mathematician, philosopher, and Catholic priest, constructed such a function; however, it was not published until 1922. See: * Martin Jašek (1922) [http://dml.cz/bitstream/handle/10338.dmlcz/121916/CasPestMatFys_051-1922-2_2.pdf "Funkce Bolzanova"] (Bolzano's function), ''Časopis pro Pěstování Matematiky a Fyziky'' (Journal for the Cultivation of Mathematics and Physics), vol. 51, no. 2, pages 69–76 (in Czech and German). * [[Vojtěch Jarník]] (1922) "O funkci Bolzanově" (On Bolzano's function), ''Časopis pro Pěstování Matematiky a Fyziky'' (Journal for the Cultivation of Mathematics and Physics), vol. 51, no. 4, pages 248 - 264 (in Czech). Available on-line in Czech at: http://dml.cz/bitstream/handle/10338.dmlcz/109021/CasPestMatFys_051-1922-4_5.pdf . Available on-line in English at: http://dml.cz/bitstream/handle/10338.dmlcz/400073/Bolzano_15-1981-1_6.pdf . * Karel Rychlík (1923) "Über eine Funktion aus Bolzanos handschriftlichem Nachlasse" (On a function from Bolzano's literary remains in manuscript), ''Sitzungsberichte der königlichen Böhmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften'' (Prag) (Proceedings of the Royal Bohemian Society of Philosophy in Prague) (for the years 1921-1922), Class II, no. 4, pages 1-20. (''Sitzungsberichte'' was continued as: ''Věstník Královské české společnosti nauk, třída matematicko-přírodovědecká'' (Journal of the Royal Czech Society of Science, Mathematics and Natural Sciences Class).) Around 1860, Charles Cellérier (1818 - 1889), a professor of mathematics, mechanics, astronomy, and physical geography at the University of Geneva, Switzerland, independently formulated a continuous, nowhere differentiable function that closely resembles Weierstrass's function. Cellérier's discovery was, however, published posthumously: * Cellérier, C. (1890) [https://books.google.com/books?id=HMghAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA142 "Note sur les principes fondamentaux de l'analyse"] (Note on the fundamental principles of analysis), ''Bulletin des sciences mathématiques'', second series, vol. 14, pages 142 - 160.</ref> Weierstrass's demonstration that continuity did not imply almost-everywhere differentiability upended mathematics, overturning several proofs that relied on geometric intuition and vague definitions of [[smoothness]]. These types of functions were disliked by contemporaries: [[Charles Hermite]], on finding that one class of function he was working on had such a property, described it as a "lamentable scourge"{{Disputed inline|Accuracy of Poincaré quote in lead|date=March 2025}}.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Hermite |first1=Charles |author-link1=Charles Hermite |last2=Stieltjes |first2=Thomas |author-link2=Thomas Joannes Stieltjes |title=Correspondance d'Hermite et de Stieltjes |chapter=Letter 374, 20 May 1893 |editor-last1=Baillaud |editor-first1=Benjamin |editor-last2=Bourget |editor-first2=Henri |volume=2 |publisher=Gauthier-Villars |year=1905 |pages=317–319 |language=fr}} </ref> The functions were difficult to visualize until the arrival of computers in the next century, and the results did not gain wide acceptance until practical applications such as models of [[Brownian motion]] necessitated infinitely jagged functions (nowadays known as fractal curves).<ref>{{cite web | url = https://nautil.us/maths-beautiful-monsters-234859/ | title = Math's Beautiful Monsters: How a destructive idea paved the way for modern math | last = Kucharski | first = Adam | date = 2017-10-26 | access-date = 2023-10-11}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)