Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Well-founded relation
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Type of binary relation}} {{Redirect|Noetherian induction|the use in topology|Noetherian topological space}} {{stack|{{Binary relations}}}} In [[mathematics]], a [[binary relation]] {{mvar|R}} is called '''well-founded''' (or '''wellfounded''' or '''foundational'''<ref>See Definition 6.21 in {{cite book|last1=Zaring W.M.|first1= G. Takeuti|title=Introduction to axiomatic set theory|date=1971|publisher=Springer-Verlag|location=New York|isbn=0387900241|edition=2nd, rev.}}</ref>) on a [[set (mathematics)|set]] or, more generally, a [[Class (set theory)|class]] {{mvar|X}} if every [[non-empty]] [[subset]] {{math|''S'' ⊆ ''X''}} has a [[minimal element]] with respect to {{mvar|R}}; that is, there exists an {{math|''m'' ∈ ''S''}} such that, for every {{math|''s'' ∈ ''S''}}, one does not have {{math|''s'' ''R'' ''m''}}. In other words, a relation is well-founded if: <math display=block>(\forall S \subseteq X)\; [S \neq \varnothing \implies (\exists m \in S) (\forall s \in S) \lnot(s \mathrel{R} m)].</math> Some authors include an extra condition that {{mvar|R}} is [[Set-like relation|set-like]], i.e., that the elements less than any given element form a set. Equivalently, assuming the [[axiom of dependent choice]], a relation is well-founded when it contains no [[infinite descending chain]]s, meaning there is no infinite sequence {{math|''x''<sub>0</sub>, ''x''<sub>1</sub>, ''x''<sub>2</sub>, ...}} of elements of {{mvar|X}} such that {{math|''x''<sub>''n''+1</sub> ''R'' ''x''<sub>''n''</sub>}} for every natural number {{mvar|n}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=Infinite Sequence Property of Strictly Well-Founded Relation |url=https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Infinite_Sequence_Property_of_Strictly_Well-Founded_Relation |website=ProofWiki |access-date=10 May 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Fraisse |first1=R. |author1-link=Roland Fraïssé |title=Theory of Relations, Volume 145 - 1st Edition |date=15 December 2000 |publisher=Elsevier |isbn=9780444505422 |page=46 |edition=1st |url=https://www.elsevier.com/books/theory-of-relations/fraisse/978-0-444-50542-2 |access-date=20 February 2019}}</ref> In [[order theory]], a [[partial order]] is called well-founded if the corresponding [[strict order]] is a well-founded relation. If the order is a [[total order]] then it is called a [[well-order]]. In [[set theory]], a set {{mvar|x}} is called a '''well-founded set''' if the [[element (mathematics)|set membership]] relation is well-founded on the [[Transitive closure (set)|transitive closure]] of {{mvar|x}}. The [[axiom of regularity]], which is one of the axioms of [[Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory]], asserts that all sets are well-founded. A relation {{mvar|R}} is '''converse well-founded''', '''upwards well-founded''' or '''Noetherian''' on {{mvar|X}}, if the [[converse relation]] {{math|''R''<sup>−1</sup>}} is well-founded on {{mvar|X}}. In this case {{mvar|R}} is also said to satisfy the [[ascending chain condition]]. In the context of [[rewriting]] systems, a Noetherian relation is also called '''terminating'''.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)