Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Winner's curse
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{Short description|Tendency to overestimate in auctions}} {{More footnotes|date=September 2020}} [[File:Winner's Curse.png|thumb|upright=1.4|The effects the winner's curse phenomenon has on the price of an item]] {{Auction}} The '''winner's curse''' is a phenomenon that may occur in [[common value auction]]s, where all bidders have the same (''[[ex post]]'') value for an item but receive different private (''[[Ex-ante|ex ante]]'') signals about this value and wherein the winner is the bidder with the most optimistic evaluation of the asset and therefore will tend to overestimate and overpay. Accordingly, the winner will be "cursed" in one of two ways: either the winning bid will exceed the value of the auctioned asset making the winner worse off in absolute terms, or the value of the asset will be less than the bidder anticipated, so the bidder may garner a net gain but will be worse off than anticipated.<ref>{{citation|last=Thaler |first= Richard |year= 1988 |title= Anomalies: The Winner's Curse |journal= Journal of Economic Perspectives |volume= 2 |pages= 191β202 |doi= 10.1257/jep.2.1.191 |url= https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4719439 |access-date= 2018-10-19|doi-access= free }} </ref><ref>{{citation|publisher=Investopedia |title= Winner's Curse |editor-last= Hayes |editor-first= Adam |url= https://www.investopedia.com/terms/w/winnerscurse.asp}}</ref> However, an actual overpayment will generally occur only if the winner fails to account for the winner's curse when bidding (an outcome that, according to the [[Revenue equivalence|revenue equivalence theorem]], need never occur).<ref>{{citation|last1=McAfee|first1= R. Preston |last2= McMillan |first2= John |title= Auctions and Bidding |journal= Journal of Economic Literature |volume= 25 |number= 2 |year= 1987 |pages= 699β738 |jstor= 2726107 }}</ref> The winnerβs curse phenomenon was first addressed in 1971 by three [[ARCO|Atlantic Richfield]] petroleum engineers who claimed that oil companies suffered unexpectedly low returns "year after year" in early [[Outer Continental Shelf]] oil lease auctions.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Capen |last2=Clap |last3=Campbell |title=Competitive Bidding in High-Risk Situations |journal=Journal of Petroleum Technology |date=June 1971 |volume=23 |issue=6 |pages=641 to 643 |publisher=Society of Petroleum Engineers |issn=0149-2136|doi=10.2118/2993-PA }}</ref> Outer Continental Shelf auctions are common value auctions, where the value of the oil in the ground is essentially the same to all bidders.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)