Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Address munging
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Disadvantages== Disguising addresses makes it more difficult for people to send [[electronic mail|e-mail]] to each other. Many see it as an attempt to fix a symptom rather than solving the real problem of [[e-mail spam]], at the expense of causing problems for innocent users.<ref>[http://www.interhack.net/pubs/munging-harmful/ Address Munging Considered Harmful], Matt Curtin</ref> In addition, there are e-mail address harvesters who have found ways to read the munged email addresses. The use of address munging on Usenet is contrary to the recommendations of RFC 1036 governing the format of Usenet posts, which requires a valid e-mail address be supplied in the From: field of the post. In practice, few people follow this recommendation strictly.<ref>See Usenet.</ref> Disguising e-mail addresses in a systematic manner (for example, user[at]domain[dot]com) offers little protection.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cadman |first=Kasey |date=2023-08-12 |title=The Ineffectiveness of Email Address Munging: Understanding and Alternatives |url=https://focustechs.co.uk/the-ineffectiveness-of-email-address-munging-understanding-and-alternatives/ |access-date=2024-07-18 |website=Focus Technology Solutions |language=en-GB}}</ref> Any impediment reduces the user's willingness to take the extra trouble to email the user. In contrast, well-maintained [[e-mail filtering]] on the user's end does not drive away potential correspondents. No spam filter is 100% immune to false positives, however, and the same potential correspondent that would have been deterred by address munging may instead end up wasting time on long letters that will merely disappear into junk mail folders. For commercial entities, maintaining contact forms on web pages rather than publicizing e-mail addresses may be one way to ensure that incoming messages are relatively spam-free yet do not get lost. In conjunction with [[CAPTCHA]] fields, spam on such comment fields can be reduced to effectively zero, except that non-accessibility of CAPTCHAs bring the same deterrent problems as address munging itself.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)