Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Back-side bus
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==History== BSB is an improvement over the older practice of using a single [[system bus]], because a single bus typically became a severe [[Von Neumann bottleneck|bottleneck]] as CPUs and memory speeds increased. Due to its dedicated nature, the back-side bus can be optimized for communication with cache, thus eliminating protocol overheads and additional signals that are required on a general-purpose bus. Furthermore, since a BSB operates over a shorter distance, it can typically operate at higher clock speeds, increasing the computer's overall performance. Cache connected with a BSB was initially external to the microprocessor [[Die (integrated circuit)|die]], but now is usually on-die.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.itworld.com/Comp/1091/CWD010430STO60015/ |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20010502134148/http://www.itworld.com/Comp/1091/CWD010430STO60015/ |archivedate= 2001-05-02| title=Buses: frontside and backside| publisher=[[ITworld]]| date=2001-04-30}}</ref> In the latter case, the BSB [[Clock signal|clock]] frequency is typically equal to the processor's,<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.itworld.com/Comp/1091/CWD010430STO60015/| archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20010502134148/http://www.itworld.com/Comp/1091/CWD010430STO60015/| archivedate=2001-05-02| title=Buses: frontside and backside| publisher=[[ITworld]]| date=2001-04-30}}</ref> and the back-side bus can also be made much wider (256-bit, 512-bit) than either off-chip or on-chip FSB.{{Clarify|reason=What is "on-chip FSB" and how does it differ from "off-chip FSB"? Aren't all FSBs made for off-chip communicatio?|date=July 2022}} [[File:P2 Deschutes open front.jpg|thumb|right|A Pentium II processor module with its cover removed showing the processor on the left and the L2 cache memory on the right]] The dual-bus architecture was used in a number of designs, including the [[IBM]] and [[Freescale Semiconductor|Freescale]] (formerly the semiconductor division of [[Motorola]]) [[PowerPC]] processors (certain PowerPC [[604e#PowerPC 604|604]] models, the [[PowerPC 7xx]] family,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.cnet.com/Monday+a+big+day+for+Apple/2100-1001_3-205119.html|title=Monday a big day for Apple|publisher=CNet|date=1997-11-07}}</ref> and the Freescale [[PowerPC G4|7xxx]] line), as well as the [[Intel Corporation|Intel]] [[Pentium Pro]], [[Pentium II]] and early [[Pentium III]] processors,<ref>{{cite web| url=http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid5_gci213804,00.html| title=Backside Bus| publisher=Whatis.com| date=2001-04-30}}</ref> which used it to access their L2 cache (earlier Intel processors accessed the L2 cache over the FSB, while later processors moved it on-chip).
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)