Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Biological interaction
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==History== Although biological interactions, more or less individually, were studied earlier, [[Edward Haskell]] (1949) gave an integrative approach to the thematic, proposing a classification of "co-actions",<ref>Haskell, E. F. (1949). A clarification of social science. ''Main Currents in Modern Thought'' 7: 45β51.</ref> later adopted by biologists as "interactions". Close and long-term interactions are described as [[symbiosis]];{{efn|Symbiosis was formerly used to mean a mutualism.}} symbioses that are mutually beneficial are called [[mutualism (biology)|mutualistic]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Burkholder |first=Paul R. |date=1952 |title=Cooperation and Conflict Among Primitive Organisms |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27826458 |journal=American Scientist |volume=40 |issue=4 |pages=600β631 |jstor=27826458 |issn=0003-0996}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Bronstein |first=Judith L. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hbgVDAAAQBAJ |title=Mutualism |date=2015 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-967565-4 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Pringle |first=Elizabeth G. |date=2016-10-12 |title=Orienting the Interaction Compass: Resource Availability as a Major Driver of Context Dependence |journal=PLOS Biology |language=en |volume=14 |issue=10 |pages=e2000891 |doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.2000891 |doi-access=free |issn=1545-7885 |pmc=5061325 |pmid=27732591}}</ref> The term symbiosis was subject to a century-long debate about whether it should specifically denote mutualism, as in [[lichen]]s or in parasites that benefit themselves.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Douglas |first=A. E. |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/437054000 |title=The symbiotic habit |date=2010 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0-691-11341-8 |location=Princeton, N.J. |oclc=437054000}}</ref> This debate created two different classifications for biotic interactions, one based on the time (long-term and short-term interactions), and other based on the magnitude of interaction force (competition/mutualism) or effect of individual fitness, according the '''[[stress gradient hypothesis]]''' and [[Mutualism Parasitism Continuum]]. [[Evolutionary game theory]] such as [[Red Queen hypothesis|Red Queen Hypothesis]], [[Red King hypothesis|Red King Hypothesis]] or [[Black Queen hypothesis|Black Queen Hypothesis]], have demonstrated a classification based on the force of interaction is important.{{cn|date=May 2023}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)