Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Box girder bridge
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Development of steel box girders== In 1919, [[Major (United Kingdom)|Major]] [[Giffard Le Quesne Martel|Gifford Martel]] was appointed head of the Experimental Bridging Establishment at [[Christchurch, Hampshire]],<ref>[http://www.remuseum.org.uk/corpshistory/rem_corps_part15.htm Royal Engineers Museum] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080501131923/http://www.remuseum.org.uk/corpshistory/rem_corps_part15.htm |date=1 May 2008 }}</ref> which researched the possibilities of using tanks for battlefield engineering purposes such as bridge-laying and [[land mine|mine]]-clearing. Here he continued trials on modified [[British Heavy Tanks of World War I|Mark V]] tanks. The bridging component involved an assault bridge, designed by Major [[Charles Inglis (engineer)|Charles Inglis]] RE, the Canal Lock Bridge, which had sufficient length to span a [[canal lock]]. Major Martel mated the bridge with the tank and used [[Fluid power|hydraulic power]] generated by the tank's engine to manoeuvre the bridge into place. For mine clearance the tanks were equipped with two-ton [[Mine roller|rollers]]. Martel also developed his new bridging concept at the EBE, the Martel bridge, a [[Modularity|modular]] box girder bridge suitable for military applications. The Martel bridge was adopted by the British Army in 1925 as the Large Box Girder Bridge.<ref name=thinkdef>{{cite web |url =http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2011/12/uk-military-bridging-equipment-pre-wwii-equipment-bridging/ |title =UK Military Bridging – Equipment (Pre WWII Equipment Bridging) |author =Think Defence |date =30 December 2011 |website =www.thinkdefence.co.uk |access-date =8 May 2017 |quote =Adopted by the Army in 1925 the Large Box Girder Bridge was adaptable and relatively cheap, able to carry loads of up to 40 tonnes, it remained in service until replaced by the Bailey.}}</ref> A scaled down version of this design, the [[Small Box Girder]] Bridge, was also formally adopted by the Army in 1932. This latter design was copied by many countries, including Germany, who called their version the ''Kastenträger-Gerät'' (K-Gerät for short).<ref name=thinkdef/> The United States was another country whose army created their own copy, designating it the H-20. In addition, the modular construction of the basic Martel bridge would later during WWII become part of the basis of the [[Bailey bridge]]. In 1954, the [[Royal Commission on Awards to Inventors]] awarded Martel £500 for infringement on the design of his bridge by the designer of the Bailey bridge, [[Donald Bailey (civil engineer)|Donald Bailey]].<ref>{{cite news| title = Bridge Claim By General 'Used As Basis For Bailey Design' | newspaper = The Times | date = 26 July 1955 | page = 4 col E}}</ref> Both the Large Box and Small Box designs would go on to see much service in World War II, especially in the case of the latter. The (non-modular) box girder bridge was a popular choice during the roadbuilding expansion of the 1960s, especially in the West, and many new bridge projects were in progress simultaneously. A serious blow to this use was a sequence of three serious disasters, when new bridges collapsed in 1970 ([[West Gate Bridge]] and [[Cleddau Bridge]]) and 1971 ([[:de:Südbrücke (Koblenz)|South Bridge (Koblenz)]]). Fifty-one people were killed in these failures, leading in the UK to the formation of the Merrison Committee<ref name="Merrison" >{{cite book |author=Department of the Environment (Merrison Committee of Inquiry) |title=Inquiry into the Basis of Design and Method of Erection of Steel Box Girder Bridges |publisher=[[HMSO]] |location=London |year=1973 |ref=Merrison }}</ref> and considerable investment in new research into steel box girder behaviour. Most of the bridges still under construction at this time were delayed for investigation of the basic design principle. Some were abandoned and rebuilt as a different form of bridge altogether. Most of those that remained as box girder bridges, such as [[Erskine Bridge]] (''illus.''), were either redesigned, or had additional stiffening added later. Some bridges were strengthened a few years after opening and then further strengthened years later, although this was often due to increased traffic load as much as better design standards. The [[Irwell Valley]] bridge of 1970 was strengthened in 1970 and again in 2000.<ref name="Smith & Hendy, Irwell Valley">{{cite journal |title=Strengthening of Irwell Valley Bridge, UK |last1=Smith |first1=D. A. |last2=Hendy |first2=C. R. |url=https://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/docserver/fulltext/bren161-033.pdf |year=2002 |journal=Bridge Engineering |volume=161 |issue=BE1 |publisher=[[Institution of Civil Engineers]] |pages=33–43 |ref=Smith & Hendy, Irwell Valley }}{{dead link|date=July 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)