Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Bridgehead
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Etymology== [[Image:Fortification of Huningue.jpg|thumb|A diagram of [[Huningue|Huningue's]] former fortifications. Built by [[Vauban]] (1679β1681) with a bridge and bridgehead across the Rhine. It was demolished under the terms of [[s:Treaty of Paris (1815)/Definitive Treaty#ART.III|Article III]] of the [[Treaty of Paris (1815)]].]] ''Bridgehead'' ([[French language|French]] ''tΓͺte de pont'') is a [[High Middle Ages]] military term, which before the invention of cannons meant the military [[fortification]] that protects the end of a [[bridge]]. Like many older terms, the meaning of the word drifted with the passage of time, becoming used for something not exactly true to its initial usage. With the introduction of cannons, the term was morphed to a generalized term for field fortifications lying some distance beyond the ends of the bridge that were emplaced to protect both the bridge and any troops crossing it to the far bank. This term was used in that era when referring to both the fortifications and the small lodgement on the bank which was closest to the enemy. As the process of moving an army over bridges is slow and complicated, it is usually necessary to secure it from hostile interruption, and the works constituting the bridgehead must therefore be sufficiently advanced to keep the enemy's artillery out of range of the bridges. As artillery grew in power, so did the size of the lodgements necessary. In addition, room is required for the troops to form up on the further bank. Formerly, with short-range weapons, a bridgehead was often little more than a screen for the bridge itself, but modern conditions have rendered necessary far greater extensions of bridge defenses.<ref name=EB1911>{{EB1911|inline=1|wstitle=Bridge-Head|volume=4|pages=531-532}}</ref> When armies and military formations grew, more lodgement area was required to organize a force large enough to stage a break out against a determined enemy. The technical meaning of the term expanded once again, referring to a large fortified area about at bridge end. With the advent of modern warfare capabilities, including long-range tube artillery and high-powered rifles with effective ranges measured in the thousands of yards (metres), the term of art again had to expand in area, but now morphed to be just an area defended and controlled by ample firepower, with or without constructed fortifications. The term in colloquial usage refers to any kind of defended area that is extended into hostile territory, also called a [[wikt:foothold|foothold]] and sometimes the technically incorrect '[[beachhead]]', which is frequently mistaken colloquially as synonymous terminology. The technical term refers in particular to the specific area on the far side of a defended river bank or a segment of a lake or riverine coastline held by the enemy forces, like the [[Ludendorff Bridge|Bridge at Remagen]]. The term is especially applied when such a territory is initially seized by an [[amphibious assault]] with the tactical intent of establishing a supply line across the geographic [[terrain feature|barrier feature]] to allow further [[Operational mobility|operational manoeuvring]]. In that sense, it has much in common with the popular misconception of a beachhead.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)