Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Center for Science and Culture
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==History== In 1987, the US Supreme Court ruled in ''[[Edwards v. Aguillard]]'' against [[creation science]] being taught in United States public school science classes. In reaction, the term ''intelligent design'' was coined as a substitute in drafts of the textbook ''[[Of Pandas and People]]'', which was published in 1989, beginning the campaigning of the intelligent design movement under the leadership of ''Pandas'' editor [[Charles Thaxton]].<ref name="DarkSyde">{{cite interview |last=Forrest |first=Barbara C. |interviewer=Andrew Stephen |title=Know Your Creationists: Know Your Allies |url=https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2006/03/11/193288/-Know-Your-Creationists-Know-Your-Allies |work=[[Daily Kos]] |publisher=Kos Media, LLC |location=Berkeley, CA |date=March 11, 2006 |oclc=59226519 |access-date=2014-05-16}}</ref> The ''Edwards v. Aguillard'' ruling also inspired Phillip E. Johnson to begin anti-evolution campaigning. He met Stephen C. Meyer, and through him was introduced to others who were developing what became the Wedge strategy, including [[Michael Denton]],<ref>{{cite journal |last=Ratzsch |first=Del |date=January 2005 |title=How Not to Critique Intelligent Design Theory |url=https://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&id=1177 |format=PDF |journal=[[Ars Disputandi]] |type=Book review of ''God, The Devil, and Darwin'' by [[Niall Shanks]] |location=Utrecht, Netherlands |publisher=Igitur Publishing |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=52–69 |access-date=2014-05-16|doi=10.1080/15665399.2005.10819864 |doi-access=free }}</ref> [[Michael Behe]] and [[William A. Dembski]], with Johnson becoming the de facto leader of the group. By 1995, Johnson was opposing the [[naturalism (philosophy)#Methodological naturalism|methodological naturalism]] of [[science]] in which "The Creator belongs to the realm of religion, not scientific investigation", and promoting "[[theistic science#Johnson|theistic realism]]" which "assumes that the universe and all its creatures were brought into existence for a purpose by God" and expects "this 'fact' of creation to have empirical, observable consequences."<ref name="waw">{{cite book |last=Forrest |first=Barbara |editor-last=Pennock |editor-first=Robert T |editor-link=Robert T. Pennock |year=2001 |chapter=The Wedge at Work: How Intelligent Design Creationism Is Wedging Its Way into the Cultural and Academic Mainstream |chapter-url=https://infidels.org/library/modern/barbara_forrest/wedge.html |title=Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives |location=Cambridge, MA |publisher=[[MIT Press]] |isbn=0-262-66124-1 |lccn=2001031276 |oclc=46729201 |ref=Forrest 2001 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/intelligentdesig00robe }}</ref> In December 1993, [[Bruce Chapman]], president and founder of the Discovery Institute, noticed an essay in ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' by Meyer about a dispute when biology lecturer [[Dean H. Kenyon]] taught intelligent design creationism in introductory classes.<ref name="wilgoren">{{cite news |last=Wilgoren |first=Jodi |date=August 21, 2005 |title=Politicized Scholars Put Evolution on the Defensive |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/21/national/21evolve.html?pagewanted=all |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=2014-05-06 |ref=Wilgoren 2005}}</ref><ref name="Meyer_Insight">{{cite journal |last=Meyer |first=Stephen C. |author-link=Stephen C. Meyer |date=February 21, 1994 |title=Open Debate on Life's Origins |url=https://www.discovery.org/a/94/ |journal=[[Insight on the News]] |location=Washington, D.C. |publisher=[[News World Communications]] |access-date=2014-05-16}}</ref> Kenyon had co-authored ''Of Pandas and People'', and in 1993 Meyer had contributed to the teacher's notes for the second edition of ''Pandas''. Meyer was an old friend of Discovery Institute co-founder [[George Gilder]], and over dinner about a year later they formed the idea of a think tank opposed to [[materialism]]. In mid-1995, Chapman and Meyer met a representative of [[Howard Ahmanson, Jr.]] Meyer, who had previously tutored Ahmanson's son in science, recalls being asked "What could you do if you had some financial backing?"<ref name="wilgoren"/> The '''Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture''', as it was originally named, grew out of a conference called "The Death of Materialism and the Renewal of Culture" that the Discovery Institute organised in mid-1995. It was founded in 1996 by the Discovery Institute with funding provided by Fieldstead & Company, the Stewardship Foundation, Howard Ahmanson, Jr. and the Maclellan Foundation.<ref name="waw"/><ref name="wilgoren"/><ref>{{cite press release |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Major grants help establish Center for Renewal of Science and Culture |url=http://www.discovery.org/center.html |location=Seattle, WA |publisher=Discovery Institute |date=August 10, 1996 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19961103063611/http://www.discovery.org/center.html |archive-date=1996-11-03 |access-date=2014-05-18}}</ref> The evolution of the center's name in 2002 reflects its attempt to present itself as less religiously motivated in the public's eye.<ref name="acadme">{{cite journal |last1=Forrest |first1=Barbara |last2=Branch |first2=Glenn |author-link2=Glenn Branch |date=January–February 2005 |title=Wedging Creationism into the Academy |url=http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2005/JF/Feat/forr.htm |journal=Academe |volume=91 |issue=1 |pages=36–41 |location=Washington, D.C. |publisher=[[American Association of University Professors]] |access-date=2007-08-27 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070729032153/http://aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2005/JF/Feat/forr.htm |archive-date=2007-07-29 |doi=10.2307/40252735 |jstor=40252735 |s2cid=141766477 |url-access=subscription }}also [http://astro.berkeley.edu/~kalas/ethics/documents/intelligent_design/AAUP_WedgingCreationism.pdf PDF]</ref> The evolving banners on the CRSC/CSC's website pictorially parallel these verbal efforts to disassociate the site from its overtly religious origins.<ref name=banners>{{cite web |url=https://ncse.com/creationism/general/evolving-banners-at-discovery-institute |title=Evolving Banners at the Discovery Institute |date=August 28, 2002 |website=National Center for Science Education |location=Berkeley, CA |type=Blog |access-date=2018-10-18 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180929041353/https://ncse.com/creationism/general/evolving-banners-at-discovery-institute |archive-date=2018-09-29}}</ref> The "renewal" in its name referred to its stated goal of "renewing" American culture by grounding society's major institutions, especially education, in religion as outlined in the [[Wedge strategy#Wedge Document|Wedge Document]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)