Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Cistron
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== History == The words ''cistron'' and ''gene'' were coined before the advancing state of [[biology]] made it clear to many people that the concepts they refer to, at least in some senses of the word ''gene'', are either equivalent or nearly so. The same historical naming practices are responsible for many of the [[synonym]]s in the life sciences. The term ''cistron'' was coined by [[Seymour Benzer]] in an article entitled ''The elementary units of heredity''.<ref>{{cite book | vauthors = Benzer S | date = 1957 | chapter = The elementary units of heredity | title = The Chemical Basis of Heredity | url = https://archive.org/details/symposiumonchemi00symp | url-access = registration | veditors = McElroy WD, Glass B | pages = [https://archive.org/details/symposiumonchemi00symp/page/70 70β93] | publisher = Johns Hopkins Press | location = Baltimore, Maryland }} also reprinted in {{cite book | vauthors = Benzer S | date = 1965 | chapter = The elementary units of heredity | title = Selected papers on Molecular Genetics | url = https://archive.org/details/selectedpaperson0000tayl | url-access = limited | veditors = Taylor JH | pages = [https://archive.org/details/selectedpaperson0000tayl/page/451 451]β477 | publisher = Academic Press | location = New York }}</ref> The cistron was defined by an operational test applicable to most organisms that is sometimes referred to as a cis-trans test, but more often as a [[complementation test]]. [[Richard Dawkins]] in his influential book ''[[The Selfish Gene]]'' argues ''against'' the cistron being the [[unit of selection]] and against it being the best [[gene#Definitions|definition of a gene]]. (He also argues against [[group selection]].) He does not argue against the existence of cistrons, or their being elementary, but rather against the idea that natural selection selects them; he argues that it used to, back in earlier eras of life's development, but not anymore. He defines a gene as a larger unit, which others may now call [[gene cluster]]s, as the unit of selection. He also defines replicators, more general than cistrons and genes, in this [[gene-centered view of evolution]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)