Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Classical logic
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Characteristics== Each logical system in this class shares characteristic properties:<ref>[[Dov Gabbay|Gabbay, Dov]], (1994). 'Classical vs non-classical logic'. In D.M. Gabbay, C.J. Hogger, and J.A. Robinson, (Eds), ''Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming'', volume 2, chapter 2.6. Oxford University Press.</ref> # [[Law of excluded middle]] and [[double negation elimination]] # [[Law of noncontradiction]], and the [[principle of explosion]] # [[Monotonicity of entailment]] and [[idempotency of entailment]] # [[Commutativity of conjunction]] # [[De Morgan duality]]: every [[logical operator]] is dual to another While not entailed by the preceding conditions, contemporary discussions of classical logic normally only include [[propositional calculus|propositional]] and [[first-order logic|first-order]] logics.<ref name=":0">[[Stewart Shapiro|Shapiro, Stewart]] (2000). Classical Logic. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [Web]. Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab. Retrieved October 28, 2006, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-classical/</ref><ref name="haack">[[Susan Haack|Haack, Susan]], (1996). ''Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism''. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.</ref> In other words, the overwhelming majority of time spent studying classical logic has been spent studying specifically propositional and first-order logic, as opposed to the other forms of classical logic. Most semantics of classical logic are [[Principle of bivalence|bivalent]], meaning all of the possible denotations of propositions can be categorized as either true or false.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)