Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Codex Theodosianus
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Development == On 26 March 429, Emperor Theodosius II announced to the Senate of Constantinople his intention to form a committee to codify all of the laws (''leges'', singular ''lex'') from the reign of [[Constantine the Great|Constantine]] up to Theodosius II and Valentinian III.<ref name=Stein>Peter Stein, pp. 37β38</ref> The laws in the code span from 312 to 438, so by 438 the "volume of imperial law had become unmanageable".{{sfn|Martin|1995|p=510}} Twenty-two scholars, working in two teams, worked for nine years starting in 429 to assemble what was to become the ''Theodosian Code''.{{sfn|Lenski|2003|pp=337β340}} The chief overseer of the work was [[Antiochus Chuzon]], a lawyer and a [[prefect]] and [[consul]] from [[Antioch]].{{sfn|Hornblower|Spawforth|Eidinow|2012|p=107}} Their product was a collection of 16 books containing more than 2,500 [[Constitution (Roman law)|constitutions]] issued between 313 and 437, while, at the same time, omitting obsolete provisions and superfluous phrases, and making additions, emendations, and alterations.{{sfn|Berger|1953|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=oR0LAAAAIAAJ&q=constitutions 392]}} John F. Matthews illustrated the importance of Theodosius' code when he said, "the Theodosian Code was the first occasion since the [[Twelve Tables]] on which a Roman government had attempted by public authority to collect and publish its ''leges''."{{sfn|Matthews|2000|p=17}} The code covers political, socioeconomic, cultural, and religious subjects of the 4th and 5th centuries in the Roman Empire.{{sfn|Matthews|2000|pp=10β18}} A collection of imperial enactments called the ''[[Codex Gregorianus]]'' had been written in c. 291β4{{sfn|Kazhdan|Talbot|1991|p=475}} and the ''[[Codex Hermogenianus]]'', a limited collection of rescripts from c. 295,{{sfn|Kazhdan|Talbot|1991|p=475}} was published. The [[Sirmondian constitutions|Sirmondian Constitutions]] may also represent a small-scale collection of imperial laws. However, Theodosius desired to create a more comprehensive code that would provide greater insight into law during the later empire (321β429). Peter Stein states, "Theodosius was perturbed at the low state of legal skill in his empire of the East." He started a school of law at Constantinople. In 429, he assigned a commission to collect all imperial constitutions since the time of Constantine.<ref name=Stein/> While gathering the vast amount of material, editors often had multiple copies of the same law. In addition to this, the source material the editors were drawing upon changed over time. [[Clifford Ando]] notes that according to Matthews, the editors "displayed a reliance on western provincial sources through the late 4th century and on central, eastern archives thereafter."<ref>Clifford Ando, p. 200</ref> After 6 years, an initial version was finished in 435 but was not published. Instead, it was improved upon and expanded and finally finished in 438 and taken to the Senate in Rome and Constantinople. Matthews believes that the two attempts are not the result of a failed first attempt; however, the second attempt shows "reiteration and refinement of the original goals at a new stage in the editorial process".{{sfn|Alexander|1995|p=191}} Others have put forth alternate theories to explain the lengthy editorial process and two different commissions. [[Boudewijn Sirks]] believes that "the code was compiled from imperial copy books found at Constantinople, Rome, or Ravenna, supplemented by material at a few private collections, and that the delays were caused by such problems as verifying the accuracy of the text and improving the legal coherence of the work."{{sfn|Alexander|1995|pp=191β193}} The tone of the work reflected the [[rhetoric]]al training that the drafters had received, and Averil Cameron has described it as "verbose, moralizing and pretentious".{{sfn|Cameron|1998|p=683}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)