Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Committee for Skeptical Inquiry
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== History == [[File:CSICOP Banquet.jpg|thumb|right|300px|The Banquet at the 1983 CSICOP Conference in [[Buffalo, New York]]]] The committee was officially launched on April 30, 1976, and was co-chaired by [[Paul Kurtz]] and [[Marcello Truzzi]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Rensberger |first=Boyce |date=1976-05-01 |title=Paranormal Phenomena Facing Scientific Study |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1976/05/01/archives/paranormal-phenomena-facing-scientific-study.html |access-date=2022-03-20 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> In the early 1970s, scientific skeptics were concerned that interest in the paranormal was on the rise in the United States, part of a growing tide of irrationalism.<ref name=aspr92>''The Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research'', Volume 86, No. 1, January 1992</ref>{{full citation needed|date=August 2016}} In 1975, Kurtz, a [[Secular humanism|secular humanist]], initiated a statement, "Objections to [[Astrology]]", which was co-written with [[Bart Bok]] and Lawrence E. Jerome, and endorsed by 186 scientists, including 19 Nobel laureates. The statement was published in the [[American Humanist Association]] (AHA)'s newsletter ''The Humanist'',<ref name=aspr92/> of which Kurtz was then editor. According to Kurtz, the statement was sent to every newspaper in the United States and Canada. It received a positive reaction, which encouraged Kurtz to invite skeptical researchers to a 1976 conference with the aim of establishing a new organization to critically examine a wide range of paranormal claims.<ref name=Kurtz/> Attendees included [[Martin Gardner]], [[Ray Hyman]], [[James Randi]], and Marcello Truzzi, all members of the Resources for the Scientific Evaluation of the Paranormal (RSEP), a fledgling group with objectives similar to those CSI would subsequently adopt.<ref name=aspr92/> RSEP disbanded and its members, along with [[Carl Sagan]], [[Isaac Asimov]], [[B.F. Skinner]], and [[Philip J. Klass]], then joined Kurtz, Randi, Gardner, and Hyman to formally found the Committee for Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP).<ref name="Evans2012" /> Kurtz, Randi, Gardner, and Hyman took seats on the executive board.<ref name=NYTimes>Higginbotham, Adam (November 7, 2014). [https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/09/magazine/the-unbelievable-skepticism-of-the-amazing-randi.html?_r=0 "The Unbelievable Skepticism of the Amazing Randi"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170826075948/https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/09/magazine/the-unbelievable-skepticism-of-the-amazing-randi.html?_r=0 |date=August 26, 2017 }}. ''The New York Times''.</ref> CSICOP was officially launched at a specially convened conference of the AHA on April 30 and May 1, 1976.<ref name=Kurtz>{{cite web| last = Kurtz| first = Paul|date=July 2001|url = http://www.csicop.org/si/2001-07/kurtz.html| title = A Quarter Century of Skeptical Inquiry My Personal Involvement| publisher = Skeptical Inquirer|access-date = 2008-12-01|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080305043319/http://csicop.org/si/2001-07/kurtz.html |archive-date = March 5, 2008}}</ref> According to the published correspondence between Gardner and Truzzi, disagreements over what CSICOP should show how volatile the beginnings of the organization were. Truzzi accused CSICOP of "act[ing] more like lawyers" taking on a position of dismissal before evaluating the claims, saying that CSICOP took a "debunking stance". Gardner, on the other hand, "opposed 'believers' in the paranormal becoming CSICOP members", which Truzzi supported. Gardner felt that Truzzi "conferred too much respectability to nonsense".<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Ward |first1=Ray |title=The Martin Gardner Correspondence with Marcello Truzzi |journal=Skeptical Inquirer |date=2017 |volume=41 |issue=6 |pages=57β59 |publisher=Committee for Skeptical Inquiry}}</ref> CSICOP was funded in part with donations and sales of their magazine, ''[[Skeptical Inquirer]]''.<ref name="NYTimes" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)