Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Connection (vector bundle)
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Motivation== Let {{mvar|M}} be a [[differentiable manifold]], such as [[Euclidean space]]. A vector-valued function <math>M \to \mathbb{R}^n</math> can be viewed as a [[Section (fiber bundle)|section]] of the trivial [[vector bundle]] <math>M\times \mathbb{R}^n \to M.</math> One may consider a section of a general differentiable vector bundle, and it is therefore natural to ask if it is possible to differentiate a section, as a generalization of how one differentiates a function on {{mvar|M}}. [[File:Bundle section.svg|thumb|A section of a bundle may be viewed as a generalized function from the base into the fibers of the vector bundle. This can be visualized by the graph of the section, as in the figure above.]] The model case is to differentiate a function <math>X: \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}^m</math> on Euclidean space <math>\mathbb{R}^n</math>. In this setting the derivative <math>dX</math> at a point <math>x\in \mathbb{R}^n</math> in the direction <math>v\in \mathbb{R}^n</math> may be defined by the standard formula :<math>dX(v)(x) = \lim_{t\to 0} \frac{X(x+tv) - X(x)}{t}.</math> For every <math>x\in \mathbb{R}^n</math>, this defines a new vector <math>dX(v)(x)\in\mathbb{R}^m.</math> When passing to a section <math>X</math> of a vector bundle <math>E</math> over a manifold <math>M</math>, one encounters two key issues with this definition. Firstly, since the manifold has no linear structure, the term <math>x+tv</math> makes no sense on <math>M</math>. Instead one takes a path <math>\gamma: (-1,1) \to M</math> such that <math>\gamma(0) = x, \gamma'(0) = v</math> and computes :<math>dX(v)(x) = \lim_{t\to 0} \frac{X(\gamma(t)) - X(\gamma(0))}{t}.</math> However this still does not make sense, because <math>X(\gamma(t))</math> and <math>X(\gamma(0))</math> are elements of the distinct vector spaces <math>E_{\gamma(t)}</math> and <math>E_x.</math> This means that subtraction of these two terms is not naturally defined. The problem is resolved by introducing the extra structure of a '''connection''' to the vector bundle. There are at least three perspectives from which connections can be understood. When formulated precisely, all three perspectives are equivalent. # (''[[Parallel transport]]'') A connection can be viewed as assigning to every differentiable path <math>\gamma</math> a [[linear isomorphism]] <math>P_t^{\gamma} : E_{\gamma(t)} \to E_{x}</math> for all <math>t.</math> Using this isomorphism one can transport <math>X(\gamma(t))</math> to the fibre <math>E_x</math> and then take the difference; explicitly, <math display="block">\nabla_vX = \lim_{t\to 0} \frac{P_{t}^{\gamma} X(\gamma(t)) - X(\gamma(0))}{t}.</math>In order for this to depend only on <math>v,</math> and not on the path <math>\gamma</math> extending <math>v,</math> it is necessary to place restrictions (in the definition) on the dependence of <math>P_t^{\gamma}</math> on <math>\gamma.</math> This is not straightforward to formulate, and so this notion of "parallel transport" is usually derived as a by-product of other ways of defining connections. In fact, the following notion of "Ehresmann connection" is nothing but an infinitesimal formulation of parallel transport. # (''[[Ehresmann connection]]'') The section <math>X</math> may be viewed as a smooth map from the smooth manifold <math>M</math> to the smooth manifold <math>E.</math> As such, one may consider the [[pushforward (differential)|pushforward]] <math>dX(v),</math> which is an element of the [[tangent space]] <math>T_{X(x)}E.</math> In Ehresmann's formulation of a connection, one chooses a way of assigning, to each <math>x</math> and every <math>e\in E_x,</math> a direct sum decomposition of <math>T_{X(x)}E</math> into two linear subspaces, one of which is the natural embedding of <math>E_x.</math> With this additional data, one defines <math>\nabla_vX</math> by projecting <math>dX(v)</math> to be valued in <math>E_x.</math> In order to respect the linear structure of a vector bundle, one imposes additional restrictions on how the direct sum decomposition of <math>T_{e}E</math> moves as {{mvar|e}} is varied over a fiber. # (''[[Covariant derivative]]'') The standard derivative <math>dX(v)</math> in Euclidean contexts satisfies certain dependencies on <math>X</math> and <math>v,</math> the most fundamental being linearity. A covariant derivative is defined to be any operation <math>(v,X)\mapsto\nabla_vX</math> which mimics these properties, together with a form of the [[product rule]]. Unless the base is zero-dimensional, there are always infinitely many connections which exist on a given differentiable vector bundle, and so there is always a corresponding ''choice'' of how to differentiate sections. Depending on context, there may be distinguished choices, for instance those which are determined by solving certain [[partial differential equation]]s. In the case of the [[tangent bundle]], any [[pseudo-Riemannian metric]] (and in particular any [[Riemannian metric]]) determines a canonical connection, called the [[Levi-Civita connection]].
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)