Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Consent decree
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Legal process== The process of introducing a consent decree begins with negotiation.<ref name="resnik2015" /> One of three things happens: a [[lawsuit]] is filed and the parties concerned reach an agreement prior to [[adjudication]] of the contested issues; a lawsuit is filed and actively contested, and the parties reach an agreement after the court has ruled on some issues; or the parties settle their dispute prior to the filing of a lawsuit and they simultaneously file a lawsuit and request that the court agree to the entry of [[Judgment (law)|judgment]].<ref name="resnik2015" /><ref name="isenbergh1940">{{cite journal |last1=Isenbergh |first1=Maxwell S. |last2=Rubin |first2=Seymour J. |date=1940 |title=Antitrust Enforcement Through Consent Decrees |journal=[[Harvard Law Review]] |volume=53 |issue=3 |pages=386β414 |doi=10.2307/1333475 |issn=0017-811X |jstor=1333475 }}</ref><ref name="kane">{{cite book |title=Civil Procedure in a Nutshell |last=Kane |first=Mary Kay |publisher=[[West Publishing]] |date=2001 |isbn=978-0-314-09398-1 |location=St. Paul, Minnesota |oclc=249079229 |url= https://archive.org/details/civilprocedurein00kane}}</ref> The court is meant to turn this agreement into a judicial decree.<ref name="kane" /><ref name="consent1922">{{cite journal |date=1922 |title=Consent Decrees |journal=Columbia Law Review |volume=22 |issue=4 |pages=344β348 |doi=10.2307/1111304 |issn=0010-1958 |jstor=1111304 |jstor-access=free |ref={{harvid|Consent Decrees|1922}}}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{cite journal |last=Schwarzschild |first=Maimon |date=November 1, 1984 |title=Public Law by Private Bargain: Title VII Consent Decrees and the Fairness of Negotiated Institutional Reform |url= https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2890&context=dlj |journal=Duke Law Journal |volume=33 |issue=5 |pages=887β936 |issn=0012-7086 |doi=10.2307/1372392 |jstor=1372392 |url-access=subscription }}</ref>{{sfn|Isenbergh|Rubin|1940|pp=388β389}} In many cases, the request for entry of a consent decree prompts judges to sign the documents presented then and there.<ref name="resnik2015" /><ref name=":2" /> In some cases, however, such as [[criminal case]]s, the judge must make some sorts of assessments before the court's entry of the agreement as a consent decree.<ref name="resnik2015" /> The usual consent decree is not self-executing.<ref name="consent1922" /> A consent decree is implemented when the parties transform their agreements from paper to reality.<ref name="resnik2015" /><ref name="kane" />{{sfn|Isenbergh|Rubin|1940|p=392}} The judge who signed the decree may have no involvement or may monitor the implementation.<ref name="resnik2015" /><ref name=":2" /> The judge can only step in to assist in enforcement if a party complains to the court that an opponent has failed to perform as agreed.<ref name="resnik2015" /> In this case, the offending party would be committed for [[Contempt of court|contempt]].<ref name="consent1922" /> Decrees by consent are more [[Legally binding|binding]] than those issued {{lang|la|in invitum}}, or against an unwilling party,<ref>{{cite web |title=''in invitum'' |work=Merriam-Webster.com |url= https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/in+invitum |access-date=April 6, 2014}}</ref> which are subject to modification by the same court, and reversal by higher courts.<ref name="consent1922" /> The decree issued by consent cannot be modified, except by consent. If the decree was obtained by means of [[fraud]] or given by mistake, it may be set aside by a court.<ref name="consent1922" /> Errors of law or of inferences from the facts may invalidate it completely.<ref name="consent1922" /><ref name=":2" /> Typically, a consent decree dispenses with the necessity of having proof in court, since by definition the defendant agrees to the order. Thus, the use of a consent decree does not involve a [[Sentence (law)|sentence]] or an admission of guilt.<ref name="consent1922" /><ref>{{cite book |title=Civil Procedure in a Nutshell |last=Kane |first=Mary Kay |publisher=[[West Publishing]] |date=1996 |isbn=978-0-314-06641-1 |edition=4th |location=St. Paul, Minnesota |oclc=611673986 |url= https://archive.org/details/federalincometax00burk }}</ref>{{sfn|Isenbergh|Rubin|1940|p=387}} Likewise, the consent decree prevents a [[finding of facts]], so the decree cannot be pleaded as {{lang|la|[[Res judicata|res adjudicata]]}}.<ref name="kane" /><ref name="consent1922" />{{sfn|Isenbergh|Rubin|1940|p=394}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)