Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Copenhagen interpretation
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Background== {{main|Old quantum theory}} Starting in 1900, investigations into atomic and subatomic phenomena forced a revision to the basic concepts of [[classical physics]]. However, it was not until a quarter-century had elapsed that the revision reached the status of a coherent theory. During the intervening period, now known as the time of the "[[old quantum theory]]", physicists worked with approximations and heuristic corrections to classical physics. Notable results from this period include [[Max Planck]]'s calculation of the [[blackbody radiation]] spectrum, [[Albert Einstein]]'s explanation of the [[photoelectric effect]], Einstein and [[Peter Debye]]'s work on the [[specific heat]] of solids, [[Niels Bohr]] and [[Hendrika Johanna van Leeuwen]]'s [[Bohr–van Leeuwen theorem|proof]] that classical physics cannot account for [[diamagnetism]], Bohr's model of the [[hydrogen atom]] and [[Arnold Sommerfeld]]'s extension of the [[Bohr model]] to include [[special relativity|relativistic effects]]. From 1922 through 1925, this method of heuristic corrections encountered increasing difficulties; for example, the Bohr–Sommerfeld model could not be extended from hydrogen to the next simplest case, the [[helium atom]].<ref name="chevalley1999">{{cite book|first=Catherine |last=Chevalley |chapter=Why Do We Find Bohr Obscure? |title=Epistemological and Experimental Perspectives on Quantum Physics |editor-first1=Daniel |editor-last1=Greenberger |editor-first2=Wolfgang L. |editor-last2=Reiter |editor-first3=Anton |editor-last3=Zeilinger |editor-link3=Anton Zeilinger |publisher=Springer Science+Business Media |doi=10.1007/978-94-017-1454-9 |isbn=978-9-04815-354-1 |year=1999 |pages=59–74}}</ref> The transition from the old quantum theory to full-fledged quantum physics began in 1925, when [[Werner Heisenberg]] presented a [[Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen|treatment of electron behavior]] based on discussing only "observable" quantities, meaning to Heisenberg the frequencies of light that atoms absorbed and emitted.<ref name="sources-intro">{{cite encyclopedia |first=B. L. |last=van der Waerden |author-link=Bartel Leendert van der Waerden |title=Introduction, Part II |encyclopedia=Sources of Quantum Mechanics |publisher=Dover |year=1968 |isbn=0-486-61881-1}}</ref> [[Max Born]] then realized that in Heisenberg's theory, the classical variables of position and momentum would instead be represented by [[matrix (mathematics)|matrices]], mathematical objects that can be multiplied together like numbers with the crucial difference that the order of multiplication matters. [[Erwin Schrödinger]] presented an equation that treated the electron as a wave, and Born discovered that the way to successfully interpret the [[wave function]] that appeared in the [[Schrödinger equation]] was as a tool for calculating [[probability|probabilities]].<ref>{{cite journal |last=Bernstein |first=Jeremy |author-link=Jeremy Bernstein |title=Max Born and the Quantum Theory|journal=[[American Journal of Physics]] |volume=73 |issue=11 |pages=999–1008 |year=2005|bibcode = 2005AmJPh..73..999B |doi = 10.1119/1.2060717 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Quantum mechanics cannot easily be reconciled with everyday language and observation, and has often seemed counter-intuitive to physicists, including its inventors.{{refn|group=note|As Heisenberg wrote in ''Physics and Philosophy'' (1958): "I remember discussions with Bohr which went through many hours till very late at night and ended almost in despair; and when at the end of the discussion I went alone for a walk in the neighbouring park I repeated to myself again and again the question: Can nature possibly be so absurd as it seemed to us in these atomic experiments?"}} The ideas grouped together as the Copenhagen interpretation suggest a way to think about how the mathematics of quantum theory relates to physical reality.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)