Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Critical discourse analysis
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Background== Critical discourse analysis emerged from 'critical linguistics' developed at the [[University of East Anglia]] by [[Roger Fowler]] and fellow scholars in the 1970s, and the terms are now often interchangeable.<ref>Some still insist on distinctions between the two terms, although they are relatively minor</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title=Language and Control |last=Fowler |first=Roger |author-link=Roger Fowler |author2=[[Bob Hodge (linguist)|Bob Hodge]], [[Gunther Kress]], [[Tony Trew]] |publisher=Routledge |year=1979 |isbn=978-0-7100-0288-4 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/languagecontrol0000unse }}</ref> Research in the field of [[sociolinguistics]] was paying little attention to social hierarchy and power.<ref>Wodak, R. (2001) "What CDA is about" In: Wodak, Ruth & Meyer, Michael (eds.) (2001) ''Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis.'' London: Sage. p. 5</ref> CDA was first developed by the [[Lancaster University|Lancaster]] school of linguists of which [[Norman Fairclough]] was the most prominent figure. [[Ruth Wodak]] has also made a major contribution to this field of study. In addition to [[Linguistics|linguistic]] theory, the approach draws from social theory, [[critical theory]] and contributions from [[Karl Marx]], [[Antonio Gramsci]], [[Louis Althusser]], [[Jürgen Habermas]], [[Michel Foucault]] and [[Pierre Bourdieu]]—in order to examine ideologies and power relations involved in discourse. Language connects with the social through being the primary domain of [[ideology]], and through being both a site of, and a stake in, struggles for power.<ref name=Fairclough1/> Ideology has been called the basis of the social representations of groups, and, in psychological versions of CDA developed by [[Teun A. van Dijk]] and Ruth Wodak, there is assumed to be a sociocognitive interface between [[social structure]]s and discourse structures.<ref>{{Cite book |title=Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach |last=van Dijk |first=Teun Adrianus |author-link=Teun A. van Dijk |publisher=Sage Publications |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-7619-5654-9}}</ref> The historical dimension in critical discourse studies also plays an important role.<ref>{{Cite book |title=Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis |last=Wodak |first=Ruth |author-link=Ruth Wodak |author2=Michael Meyer |publisher=Sage Publications |year=2001 |isbn=978-0-7619-6154-3}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)