Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Cross elasticity of demand
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== History == [[File:Alfred Marshall - Principles of Economics (1890), Prometheus Books.JPG|thumb|Alfred Marshall's book, where the concept 'price elasticity of demand' originated from]] The concept of "price elasticity of demand" originated by [[Alfred Marshall]] predicted relative changes between price and quantity. In the [[Cellophane paradox|Cellophane case]], Professor Stocking believed that a change in the price of one product will induce a price change of its ''rivalry'' in the same direction, so he firstly regarded that movement of two prices in the same direction explicitly reflects a high cross-price elasticity.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Lishan|first=John M.|date=1959|title=The Cellophane Case and the Cross-Elasticity of Demand|url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/antibull4&id=593&div=&collection=|journal=Antitrust Bulletin|volume=4|pages=593}}</ref> However, during 1924β1940, du Pont cellophane prices moved independently from its perceived competitors' (waxed paper, vegetable parchment, etc) price; independent price movements reflect noncompetitive pricing between cellophane and its rival products.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Waldman |first1=Don |title=The du Pont Cellophane Case Revisited: An Analysis of the Indirect Effects of Antitrust Policy on Market Structure and Performance |volume=25 |issue=4 |page=805 |journal=Antitrust Bulletin |date=1980 |doi=10.1177/0003603X8002500406 |s2cid=240425105 |access-date=25 April 2021 |url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/antibull25&i=839|url-access=subscription }}</ref> Thus, Professor Stocking's emphasis on the same movement of prices was too rigid, as the price of cellophane changed induced by three factors: #Change in demand due to price change of rival products #The production function of the cellophane #The slope and position of the cost curves of rival products. In other words, the competitive relationship between two goods (cross-price elasticity) can not be simply concluded by price change, as price change arises from both [[cost]] and [[demand]] factors. Furthermore, instead of a high positive or low positive elasticity concluded by observing respective price change, cross-elasticity of demand should be either '''positive or negative''' to represent if there is a '''complementary or substitutive relationship''' between two goods.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)