Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Cut-elimination theorem
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==The cut rule== A [[sequent]] is a logical expression relating multiple formulas, in the form {{nowrap|"<math>A_1, A_2, A_3, \ldots \vdash B_1, B_2, B_3, \ldots</math>"}}, which is to be read as "If all of {{nowrap|<math>A_1, A_2, A_3, \ldots</math>}} hold, then at least one of {{nowrap|<math>B_1, B_2, B_3, \ldots</math>}} must hold", or (as Gentzen glossed): "If (<math>A_1</math> and <math>A_2</math> and <math>A_3</math> …) then (<math>B_1</math> or <math>B_2</math> or <math>B_3</math> …)."<ref>Wilfried Buchholz, [http://www.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de/~buchholz/articles/beweisth.ps Beweistheorie] (university lecture notes about cut-elimination, German, 2002-2003)</ref> Note that the left-hand side (LHS) is a conjunction (and) and the right-hand side (RHS) is a disjunction (or). The LHS may have arbitrarily many or few formulae; when the LHS is empty, the RHS is a [[tautology (logic)|tautology]]. In LK, the RHS may also have any number of formulae—if it has none, the LHS is a [[contradiction]], whereas in LJ the RHS may only have one formula or none: here we see that allowing more than one formula in the RHS is equivalent, in the presence of the right contraction rule, to the admissibility of the [[law of the excluded middle]]. However, the sequent calculus is a fairly expressive framework, and there have been sequent calculi for intuitionistic logic proposed that allow many formulae in the RHS. From [[Jean-Yves Girard]]'s logic LC it is easy to obtain a rather natural formalisation of classical logic where the RHS contains at most one formula; it is the interplay of the logical and [[structural rule]]s that is the key here. "Cut" is a [[rule of inference]] in the normal statement of the [[sequent calculus]], and equivalent to a variety of rules in other [[proof theory|proof theories]], which, given <ol><li><math> \Gamma \vdash A,\Delta</math></li></ol> and <ol start="2"><li><math> \Pi, A \vdash \Lambda</math></li></ol> allows one to infer <ol start="3"><li><math>\Gamma, \Pi \vdash \Delta,\Lambda</math></li></ol> That is, it "cuts" the occurrences of the formula <math>A</math> out of the inferential relation.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)