Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Diophantine approximation
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Best Diophantine approximations of a real number == {{main|Simple continued fraction#Best rational approximations|Irrationality measure}} Given a real number {{math|''Ξ±''}}, there are two ways to define a best Diophantine approximation of {{math|''Ξ±''}}. For the first definition,<ref name="Khinchin 1997 p.21">{{harvnb|Khinchin|1997|p=21}}</ref> the rational number {{math|''p''/''q''}} is a ''best Diophantine approximation'' of {{math|''Ξ±''}} if :<math>\left|\alpha -\frac{p}{q}\right | < \left|\alpha -\frac{p'}{q'}\right |,</math> for every rational number {{math|''p'''/''q' ''}} different from {{math|''p''/''q''}} such that {{math|0 < ''q''′ β€ ''q''}}. For the second definition,<ref>{{harvnb|Cassels|1957|p=2}}</ref><ref name=Lang9>{{harvnb|Lang|1995|p=9}}</ref> the above inequality is replaced by :<math>\left|q\alpha -p\right| < \left|q^\prime\alpha - p^\prime\right|.</math> A best approximation for the second definition is also a best approximation for the first one, but the converse is not true in general.<ref name=Khinchin24>{{harvnb|Khinchin|1997|p=24}}</ref> The theory of [[Simple continued fraction|continued fraction]]s allows us to compute the best approximations of a real number: for the second definition, they are the [[Simple continued fraction#Convergents|convergents]] of its expression as a regular continued fraction.<ref name=Lang9/><ref name=Khinchin24/><ref>{{harvnb|Cassels|1957|pp=5β8}}</ref> For the first definition, one has to consider also the [[Simple continued fraction#Semiconvergents|semiconvergents]].<ref name="Khinchin 1997 p.21"/> For example, the constant ''e'' = 2.718281828459045235... has the (regular) continued fraction representation :<math>[2;1,2,1,1,4,1,1,6,1,1,8,1,\ldots\;].</math> Its best approximations for the second definition are :<math> 3, \tfrac{8}{3}, \tfrac{11}{4}, \tfrac{19}{7}, \tfrac{87}{32}, \ldots\, ,</math> while, for the first definition, they are :<math>3, \tfrac{5}{2}, \tfrac{8}{3}, \tfrac{11}{4}, \tfrac{19}{7}, \tfrac{49}{18}, \tfrac{68}{25}, \tfrac{87}{32}, \tfrac{106}{39}, \ldots\, .</math>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)