Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Distributism
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Overview == According to distributists, the [[right to property]] is a fundamental right,<ref name=":0">Shiach, Morag (2004). ''Modernism, Labour and Selfhood in British Literature and Culture, 1890β1930''. [[Cambridge University Press]]. p. 224. {{ISBN|978-0-521-83459-9}}</ref> and the [[means of production]] should be spread as widely as possible rather than being centralised under the control of the state ([[statocracy]]), a few individuals ([[plutocracy]]), or corporations ([[corporatocracy]]). Therefore, distributism advocates a society marked by widespread property ownership.<ref name=Zwick>Zwick, Mark and Louise (2004). ''The Catholic Worker Movement: Intellectual and Spiritual Origins ''. [[Paulist Press]]. p. 156. {{ISBN|978-0-8091-4315-3}}</ref> [[Cooperative economist]] [[Race Mathews]] argues that such a system is key to creating a just [[social order]].<ref>Gibson-Graham, J.K. (2006). ''A Postcapitalist Politics''. [[University of Minnesota Press]]. p. 224. {{ISBN|978-0-8166-4804-7}}.</ref> Distributism has often been described in opposition to both ''[[laissez-faire]]'' [[capitalism]] and [[state socialism]]<ref>Boyle, David; Simms, Andrew (2009). ''The New Economics''. [[Routledge]]. p. 20. {{ISBN|978-1-84407-675-8}}</ref><ref>Novak, Michael; Younkins, Edward W. (2001). ''Three in One: Essays on Democratic Capitalism, 1976β2000''. [[Rowman and Littlefield]]. p. 152. {{ISBN|978-0-7425-1171-2}}</ref> which distributists see as equally flawed and exploitative.<ref name="Prentiss, Craig R. 2008 p. 77">Prentiss, Craig R. (2008). ''Debating God's Economy: Social Justice in America on the Eve of Vatican II''. [[Penn State University Press]]. p. 77. {{ISBN|978-0-271-03341-9}}</ref> Furthermore, some distributists argue that state capitalism and state socialism are the logical conclusion of [[capitalism]] as capitalism's concentrated powers eventually capture the state.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2012/12/why-isnt-romania-rich/|title=Why Isn't Romania Rich?|website=Front Porch Republic|date=5 December 2012 |access-date=8 August 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hsnsw.asn.au/Distributism.html|title=Distributism as an equalitarian economic policy.|website=Humanist Society of New South Wales Inc.|access-date=8 August 2017}}</ref> Thomas Storck argues: "Both socialism and capitalism are products of the [[Age of Enlightenment|European Enlightenment]] and are thus modernising and anti-traditional forces. In contrast, distributism seeks to subordinate economic activity to human life as a whole, to our spiritual life, our intellectual life, our family life."<ref>Storck, Thomas. "Capitalism and Distributism: two systems at war," in ''Beyond Capitalism & Socialism''. Tobias J. Lanz, ed. IHS Press, 2008. p. 75</ref> A few distributists, including [[Dorothy Day]],<ref>Dorothy, Day. ''On Pilgrimage''. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1999. p. 40.</ref> were influenced by the economic ideas of [[Pierre-Joseph Proudhon]] and his [[Mutualism (economic theory)|mutualist]] economic theory.<ref>McKay, Iain. ''An Anarchist FAQ Volume One''. AK Press, 2007. p. 75</ref> The lesser-known [[anarchist]] branch of distributism of Day and the [[Catholic Worker Movement]] can be considered a form of free-market [[libertarian socialism]] due to their opposition to state capitalism and state socialism.<ref>McKay, Iain. ''An Anarchist FAQ Volume One''. AK Press, 2007. p. 23</ref> Some have seen it more as an aspiration, successfully realised in the short term by the commitment to the principles of [[subsidiarity]] and [[Social solidarity|solidarity]] (built into financially independent local [[cooperative]]s and small [[family business]]es). However, proponents also cite such periods as the [[Middle Ages]] as examples of the long-term historical viability of distributism.<ref>Hilaire Belloc, "The Servile Institution Dissolved," ''The Servile State'', (1913; reprint, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1977), 71β83.</ref> Particularly influential in the development of distributist theory were [[Catholic Church|Catholic]] authors [[G. K. Chesterton]] and [[Hilaire Belloc]],<ref name="Prentiss, Craig R. 2008 p. 77"/> two of distributism's earliest and strongest proponents.<ref>Fitzgerald, Ross et al. (2003). ''The Pope's Battalions: Santamaria, Catholicism and the Labor Split''. [[University of Queensland Press]]. p. 21. {{ISBN|978-0-7022-3389-0}}</ref><ref name="Riff, Michael A. 1990 p. 35">Riff, Michael A. (1990). ''Dictionary of Modern Political Ideologies''. [[Manchester University Press]]. p. 35. {{ISBN|978-0-7190-3289-9}}</ref><ref>{{cite thesis |last=Schulz, Jr.|first=William Patric<!--do not change; this name is not spelled in error--> |date=2017|title=Dorothy Day's Distributism and Her Vision for Catholic Politics |degree=PhD |publisher=[[Louisiana State University]]}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)