Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
El Tor
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==History== At the turn of the 20th century, the [[Ottoman Empire|Ottoman]] government established six medical stations along the coast of the Sinai Peninsula to cater to pilgrims returning from Mecca. One of them was in [[El Tor, Egypt|El Tor]] (A' Tur as it is called today). Sick passengers were dropped off in one of the stations for treatment. In 1905, Felix Gotschlich, a German physician at the El Tor station identified vibrios in stool specimen of two pilgrims returning from [[Mecca]]. Though the pilgrims failed to show ante or post mortem evidence of cholera, the vibrios isolated agglutinated with the anti-cholera serum. He did not think it was cholera, since it was hemolytic for human and animal red cells, while the true ''Vibrio cholerae'' is not. At that time, there was no cholera epidemic in Mecca or at the El Tor station, and the two pilgrims died from other causes.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Gotschlich|first=Felix|date=1906|title=Über Cholera- und choleraähnliche Vibrionen unter den aus Mekka zurückkehrenden Pilgern|journal= Zeitschrift für Hygiene und Infektionskrankheiten|volume=53|pages=281–304|doi=10.1007/BF02217420|s2cid=40069085|url=https://zenodo.org/record/2030536}}</ref> Later in 1905, Kraus and Pribram found that the bacteria, which produced soluble hemolysin, were more related to non-cholera vibrios; therefore, referred to all hemolytic vibrios as El Tor vibrios. In the early 1930s, A. Shousha, A. Gardner and K. Venkatraman, all researchers, suggested that only hemolytic vibrios agglutinated with anti-cholera serum should be referred to as El Tor vibrios. In 1959, R. Pollitzer designated El Tor as its own species ''V. eltor'' separate from ''V. cholerae'', but six years later, in 1965, R. Hugh discovered that ''V. cholerae'' and ''V. eltor'' were similar in 30 positive and 20 negative characteristics. Thus, they were classified as a single species ''V. cholerae'': however, Hugh believed the differing features between the two could be of epidemiological importance, so El Tor vibrios were further classified as ''V. cholerae'' biotype eltor (serogroup O1).<ref name="Barua1972"> {{cite journal |doi= 10.1038/239137a0 |author= Barua, D., & Cvjetanovic B. |title= The seventh pandemic of cholera |journal= Nature |volume= 239 |issue=5368 |pages=137–8 |year=1972 |pmid= 4561957 |bibcode= 1972Natur.239..137C |s2cid= 2130483 }}</ref> El Tor was identified again in an outbreak in 1937 but the pandemic did not arise [[1961–1975 cholera pandemic|until 1961]] in [[Sulawesi]]. El Tor spread through Asia ([[Bangladesh]] in 1963, [[India]] in 1964) and then into the Middle East, Africa and Europe. From North Africa it spread into [[Italy]] by 1973. The extent of the pandemic has been due to the relative mildness (lower expression level) of El Tor, the disease has many more asymptomatic carriers than is usual, outnumbering active cases by up to 50:1. The outbreaks during this time frame are believed to be due to the rapid development of transportation and communication on an international level, as well as decreased sanitation levels in areas with increasing populations.<ref name="Barua1972" /> In the late 1970s there were small outbreaks in Japan and in the South Pacific. Molecular evidence, that is, a specific pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profile, suggests that the distinct genotype of El Tor strain which appeared in Calcutta in 1993, may have spread to Africa. In the country of Guinea-Bissau, it was responsible for an epidemic that began in October 1994 and continued into 1996.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Sharma |first=C. |year=1998 |title=Molecular Evidence that a Distinct ''Vibrio cholerae'' O1 Biotype El Tor Strain in Calcutta May Have Spread to the African Continent |journal=[[Journal of Clinical Microbiology]] |volume=36 |issue=3 |pages=843–844 |doi= 10.1128/JCM.36.3.843-844.1998|pmc=104642 |pmid=9508329|display-authors=etal}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)