Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Election monitoring
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==History== The first monitored election was that of an 1857 [[plebiscite]] in [[Moldavia]] and [[Wallachia]] (current Romania) that was monitored by most of the major European powers. Election monitoring was uncommon until after [[World War II]]. During the 1960s, less than 10% of elections were monitored.<ref name="Matanock">{{Cite journal|last=Matanock|first=Aila M.|date=2020|title=How International Actors Help Enforce Domestic Deals|journal=Annual Review of Political Science|volume=23|issue=1|pages=357β383|doi=10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-033504|issn=1094-2939|doi-access=free}}</ref> Election observation activities have expanded significantly following the end of the [[Cold War]], along with the development of international standards on the conduct of [[democratic election]]s and the process of monitoring elections by both international<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ndi.org/files/1923_declaration_102705_0.pdf|title=Declaration of Principles for International Election Observation}}</ref> and domestic<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gndem.org/sites/default/files/declaration/Declaration_of_Global_Principles.pdf |title=Declaration of Global Principles for Nonpartisan Election Observation and Monitoring by Citizen Organizations }}{{dead link|date=May 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> observing organizations. By the 2000s, about 80% of all elections were observed.<ref name="Matanock"/> During the 2010s and early 2020s, there was an increased prevalence of low-quality election monitors who validated flawed elections.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last=Bush |first=Sarah Sunn |last2=Cottiero |first2=Christina |last3=Prather |first3=Lauren |date=2024 |title=Zombies ahead: Explaining the rise of low-quality election monitoring |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-024-09554-3 |journal=The Review of International Organizations |doi=10.1007/s11558-024-09554-3 |issn=1559-744X|doi-access=free }}</ref> These election monitors tended to have ties to autocratic states and authoritarian regional organizations, such as [[Shanghai Cooperation Organisation|Shanghai Cooperation Organization]] (SCO), [[Commonwealth of Independent States|Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS)]], [[GUAM Organization for Democracy and Economic Development|Organization for Democracy and Economic Development (GUAM)]], and [[Southern African Development Community]].<ref name=":0" />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)