Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Epidemiology
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== History == The Greek physician [[Hippocrates]], taught by Democritus, was known as the father of [[medicine]],<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=E-OZbEmPSTkC&pg=PA93 |title=A history of epidemiologic methods and concepts |author=Alfredo Morabia |year=2004 |publisher=Birkhäuser |page=93 |isbn=978-3-7643-6818-0}}</ref><ref>[http://samples.jbpub.com/9780763766221/66221_CH02_5398.pdf Historical Developments in Epidemiology] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180219135301/http://samples.jbpub.com/9780763766221/66221_CH02_5398.pdf |date=19 February 2018 }}. Chapter 2. Jones & Bartlett Learning LLC.</ref> sought a logic to sickness; he is the first person known to have examined the relationships between the occurrence of disease and environmental influences.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RMDBh6gw1_UC&pg=PA24 |title=Introduction to Epidemiology |author=Ray M. Merrill |year=2010 |publisher=Jones & Bartlett Learning |page=24 |isbn=978-0-7637-6622-1}}</ref> Hippocrates believed sickness of the human body to be caused by an imbalance of the four [[humorism|humors]] (black bile, yellow bile, blood, and phlegm). The cure to the sickness was to remove or add the humor in question to balance the body. This belief led to the application of bloodletting and dieting in medicine.<ref name="Merril, Ray M. 2010">Merril, Ray M., PhD, MPH. (2010): ''An Introduction to Epidemiology'', Fifth Edition. Chapter 2: "Historic Developments in Epidemiology". Jones and Bartlett Publishing</ref> He coined the terms [[Endemic (epidemiology)|''endemic'']] (for diseases usually found in some places but not in others) and ''[[epidemic]]'' (for diseases that are seen at some times but not others).<ref name="hip">{{cite web |title=Changing Concepts: Background to Epidemiology |publisher=Duncan & Associates |url=http://www.duncan-associates.com/changing_concepts.pdf |access-date=3 February 2008 |archive-date=25 July 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110725065539/http://www.duncan-associates.com/changing_concepts.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> === Modern era === {{See also|History of emerging infectious diseases}} In the middle of the 16th century, a doctor from [[Verona]] named [[Girolamo Fracastoro]] was the first to propose a theory that the very small, unseeable, particles that cause disease were alive. They were considered to be able to spread by air, multiply by themselves and to be destroyable by fire. In this way he refuted [[Galen]]'s [[Miasma theory of disease|miasma theory]] (poison gas in sick people). In 1543 he wrote a book ''[[De contagione et contagiosis morbis]]'', in which he was the first to promote personal and environmental [[hygiene]] to prevent disease. The development of a sufficiently powerful microscope by [[Antonie van Leeuwenhoek]] in 1675 provided visual evidence of living particles consistent with a [[germ theory of disease]].{{citation needed|date=June 2022}} During the [[Ming dynasty]], [[Wu Youke]] (1582–1652) developed the idea that some diseases were caused by transmissible agents, which he called ''Li Qi'' (戾气 or pestilential factors) when he observed various epidemics rage around him between 1641 and 1644.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Joseph |first1=P Byre |title=Encyclopedia of the Black Death |date=2012 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |isbn=978-1598842548 |page=76 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AppsDAKOW3QC&pg=PA76 |access-date=24 February 2019}}</ref> His book ''Wen Yi Lun'' (瘟疫论, Treatise on Pestilence/Treatise of Epidemic Diseases) can be regarded as the main etiological work that brought forward the concept.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Guobin |first1=Xu |last2=Yanhui |first2=Chen |last3=Lianhua |first3=Xu |title=Introduction to Chinese Culture: Cultural History, Arts, Festivals and Rituals |year= 2018 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-9811081569 |page=70 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-KFTDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA70 |access-date=24 February 2019}}</ref> His concepts were still being considered in analysing SARS outbreak by WHO in 2004 in the context of traditional Chinese medicine.<ref>{{cite web |title=Report 1: Clinical research on treatment of SARS with integrated Traditional Chinese medicine and Western Medicine |work=SARS: Clinical Trials on Treatment Using a Combination of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine |date=2004 |url=http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js6170e/4.html#Js6170e.4 |publisher=World Health Organization |access-date=24 February 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180608111238/http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js6170e/4.html |archive-date=8 June 2018}}</ref> Another pioneer, [[Thomas Sydenham]] (1624–1689), was the first to distinguish the fevers of Londoners in the later 1600s. His theories on cures of fevers met with much resistance from traditional physicians at the time. He was not able to find the initial cause of the [[smallpox]] fever he researched and treated.<ref name="Merril, Ray M. 2010"/> [[John Graunt]], a [[haberdasher]] and amateur statistician, published ''Natural and Political Observations ... upon the Bills of Mortality'' in 1662. In it, he analysed the mortality rolls in [[London]] before the [[Great Plague of London|Great Plague]], presented one of the first [[life tables]], and reported time trends for many diseases, new and old. He provided statistical evidence for many theories on disease, and also refuted some widespread ideas on them.{{citation needed|date=June 2022}} [[File:Snow-cholera-map.jpg|thumb|350px|Original map by [[John Snow (physician)|John Snow]] showing the [[cluster (epidemiology)|clusters]] of cholera cases in the [[1854 Broad Street cholera outbreak|London epidemic of 1854]]]] [[John Snow (physician)|John Snow]] is famous for his investigations into the causes of the 19th-century [[cholera]] epidemics, and is also known as the father of (modern) Epidemiology.<ref>{{cite journal |url-status=dead |url=http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/snow/fatherofepidemiology.html |title=Doctor John Snow Blames Water Pollution for Cholera Epidemic |first1=David |last1=Vachon |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111228050259/http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/snow/fatherofepidemiology.html |archive-date=28 December 2011 |website= UCLA Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health |date=May–June 2005}}</ref><ref>"[https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=3935461 John Snow, Father of Epidemiology]", NPR, ''Talk of the Nation''. 24 September 2004. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170620140913/http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=3935461 |date=20 June 2017 }}.</ref> He began with noticing the significantly higher death rates in two areas supplied by Southwark Company. His identification of the [[Broadwick Street|Broad Street]] pump as the cause of the Soho epidemic is considered the classic example of epidemiology. Snow used chlorine in an attempt to clean the water and removed the handle; this ended the outbreak. This has been perceived as a major event in the history of [[public health]] and regarded as the founding event of the science of epidemiology, having helped shape public health policies around the world.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/snow/importance.html|title=Importance of Snow|website=Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health |url-status=dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210617195407/https://www.ph.ucla.edu/epi/snow/importance.html |archive-date= Jun 17, 2021 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url-status=dead |url=http://www.jsi.com/JSIInternet/About/snow.cfm |title=Dr. John Snow |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140616100942/http://www.jsi.com/JSIInternet/About/snow.cfm |archive-date=16 June 2014 |publisher= John Snow, Inc. and JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc.}}</ref> However, Snow's research and preventive measures to avoid further outbreaks were not fully accepted or put into practice until after his death due to the prevailing [[Miasma theory|Miasma Theory]] of the time, a model of disease in which poor air quality was blamed for illness. This was used to rationalize high rates of infection in impoverished areas instead of addressing the underlying issues of poor nutrition and sanitation, and was proven false by his work.<ref>{{Citation|last=Johnson, Steven|title=The ghost map : [the story of London's most terrifying epidemic – and how it changed science, cities, and the modern world]|url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/1062993385|oclc=1062993385|access-date=2020-09-16}}</ref> Other pioneers include Danish physician [[Peter Anton Schleisner]], who in 1849 related his work on the prevention of the epidemic of [[neonatal tetanus]] on the [[Vestmanna Islands]] in [[Iceland]].<ref>{{cite journal |author1=Ólöf Garðarsdóttir |author2=Loftur Guttormsson |title=Public health measures against neonatal tetanus on the island of Vestmannaeyjar (Iceland) during the 19th century |journal=The History of the Family|volume=14 |issue=3 |date=25 August 2009 |pages=266–79 |doi=10.1016/j.hisfam.2009.08.004|s2cid=72505045 }}{{Verify source|date=April 2011}}</ref><!-- please check also Daniel E. Vaisey, "An Estimate of Neonatal Tetanus Mortality in Iceland, 1790–1839" European Journal of Population 13 (1997), 62, 67 as cited in Loftur Guttormsson and Ólöf Garðarsdóttir [http://www.ep.liu.se/ej/hygiea/ "The Development of Infant Mortality in Iceland 1800–1920"] (2002) Hygiea Internationalis 3(1) pp. 151–77 --> Another important pioneer was [[Hungary|Hungarian]] physician [[Ignaz Semmelweis]], who in 1847 brought down infant mortality at a Vienna hospital by instituting a disinfection procedure. His findings were published in 1850, but his work was ill-received by his colleagues, who discontinued the procedure. Disinfection did not become widely practiced until British surgeon [[Joseph Lister, 1st Baron Lister|Joseph Lister]], aided by his college, chemist [[Thomas Anderson (chemist)|Thomas Anderson]], was able to "discover" [[antiseptics]] in 1865 based on the earlier work of [[Louis Pasteur]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Hollingham |first=Richard |date=2020-08-20 |title=The pioneering surgeons who cleaned up filthy hospitals |url=https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200812-the-pioneering-surgeons-who-cleaned-up-filthy-hospitals |access-date=2025-03-11 |website=www.bbc.com |language=en-GB}}</ref> In the early 20th century, mathematical methods were introduced into epidemiology by [[Ronald Ross]], [[Janet Lane-Claypon]], [[Anderson Gray McKendrick]], and others.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=6DD1FKq6fFoC&q=mathematical+methods+were+introduced+into+epidemiology+20th+century+ross&pg=PA323 Statisticians of the centuries] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220630015959/https://books.google.com/books?id=6DD1FKq6fFoC&pg=PA323#v=onepage&q=mathematical%20methods%20were%20introduced%20into%20epidemiology%2020th%20century%20ross |date=30 June 2022 }}. By C. C. Heyde, Eugene Senet</ref><ref>[http://statprob.com/encyclopedia/AndersonGrayMcKENDRICK.html Anderson Gray McKendrick] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110822114404/http://statprob.com/encyclopedia/AndersonGrayMcKENDRICK.html |date=22 August 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://oneweb.soton.ac.uk/node/201970|title=Homepage|publisher=Tel: +4423 8059 5000 Fax: +4423 8059 3131 University of Southampton University Road Southampton SO17 1BJ United Kingdom|website=University of Southampton}}{{Dead link|date=May 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.epidemiology.ch/history/papers/SPM%2047(6)%20359-65%20Paneth%20et%20al.%20_%20Part%202.pdf |title=Origins and early development of the case-control study |access-date=31 August 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170118055648/http://www.epidemiology.ch/history/papers/SPM%2047(6)%20359-65%20Paneth%20et%20al.%20_%20Part%202.pdf |archive-date=18 January 2017 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref> In a parallel development during the 1920s, German-Swiss pathologist [[Max Askanazy]] and others founded the International Society for Geographical Pathology to systematically investigate the geographical pathology of cancer and other non-infectious diseases across populations in different regions. After World War II, [[Richard Doll]] and other non-pathologists joined the field and advanced methods to study cancer, a disease with patterns and mode of occurrences that could not be suitably studied with the methods developed for epidemics of infectious diseases. Geography pathology eventually combined with infectious disease epidemiology to make the field that is epidemiology today.<ref name="cancer">{{cite journal |author=Mueller LM |title=Cancer in the tropics: geographical pathology and the formation of cancer epidemiology |journal=BioSocieties|pages=512–528 |year=2019 |volume=14 |issue=4 |doi=10.1057/s41292-019-00152-w|hdl=1721.1/128433 |s2cid=181518236 |hdl-access=free }}</ref> Another breakthrough was the 1954 publication of the results of a [[British Doctors Study]], led by [[Richard Doll]] and [[Austin Bradford Hill]], which lent very strong statistical support to the link between [[tobacco smoking]] and [[lung cancer]].{{cn|date=November 2023}} In the late 20th century, with the advancement of biomedical sciences, a number of molecular markers in blood, other biospecimens and environment were identified as predictors of development or risk of a certain disease. Epidemiology research to examine the relationship between these [[biomarker]]s analyzed at the molecular level and disease was broadly named "[[molecular epidemiology]]". Specifically, "[[genetic epidemiology]]" has been used for epidemiology of germline genetic variation and disease. Genetic variation is typically determined using DNA from peripheral blood leukocytes.{{citation needed|date=June 2022}} === 21st century === Since the 2000s, [[Genome-wide association study|genome-wide association studies]] (GWAS) have been commonly performed to identify genetic risk factors for many diseases and health conditions.<ref>{{Cite web |date=17 August 2020 |title=Genome-Wide Association Studies Fact Sheet |url=https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/fact-sheets/Genome-Wide-Association-Studies-Fact-Sheet |access-date=17 June 2024 |website=National Human Genome Research Institute}}</ref> While most molecular epidemiology studies are still using conventional disease [[diagnosis]] and classification systems, it is increasingly recognized that disease progression represents inherently heterogeneous processes differing from person to person. Conceptually, each individual has a unique disease process different from any other individual ("the unique disease principle"),<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Ogino S, Fuchs CS, Giovannucci E | year = 2012 | title = How many molecular subtypes? Implications of the unique tumor principle in personalized medicine | journal = Expert Rev Mol Diagn | volume = 12 | issue = 6| pages = 621–28 | doi=10.1586/erm.12.46 | pmid=22845482 | pmc=3492839}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Ogino S, Lochhead P, Chan AT, Nishihara R, Cho E, Wolpin BM, Meyerhardt JA, Meissner A, Schernhammer ES, Fuchs CS, Giovannucci E | year = 2013 | title = Molecular pathological epidemiology of epigenetics: Emerging integrative science to analyze environment, host, and disease | journal = Mod Pathol | volume = 26 | issue = 4| pages = 465–84 | doi=10.1038/modpathol.2012.214 | pmid=23307060 | pmc=3637979}}</ref> considering uniqueness of the [[exposome]] (a totality of endogenous and exogenous / environmental exposures) and its unique influence on molecular pathologic process in each individual. Studies to examine the relationship between an exposure and molecular pathologic signature of disease (particularly [[cancer]]) became increasingly common throughout the 2000s. However, the use of [[molecular pathology]] in epidemiology posed unique challenges, including lack of research guidelines and standardized [[Statistics|statistical]] methodologies, and paucity of interdisciplinary experts and training programs.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Ogino S, King EE, Beck AH, Sherman ME, Milner DA, Giovannucci E | year = 2012 | title = Interdisciplinary education to integrate pathology and epidemiology: Towards molecular and population-level health science | journal = Am J Epidemiol | volume = 176 | issue = 8| pages = 659–67 | doi=10.1093/aje/kws226| pmid = 22935517 | pmc = 3571252}}</ref> Furthermore, the concept of disease heterogeneity appears to conflict with the long-standing premise in epidemiology that individuals with the same disease name have similar etiologies and disease processes. To resolve these issues and advance population health science in the era of molecular [[precision medicine]], "molecular pathology" and "epidemiology" was integrated to create a new interdisciplinary field of "[[molecular pathological epidemiology]]" (MPE),<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Ogino S, Stampfer M | year = 2010 | title = Lifestyle factors and microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: the evolving field of molecular pathological epidemiology | journal = J Natl Cancer Inst | volume = 102 | issue = 6| pages = 365–67 | doi=10.1093/jnci/djq031 | pmid=20208016 | pmc=2841039}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Ogino S, Chan AT, Fuchs CS, Giovannucci E | year = 2011 | title = Molecular pathological epidemiology of colorectal neoplasia: an emerging transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary field | journal = Gut | volume = 60 | issue = 3| pages = 397–411 | doi=10.1136/gut.2010.217182 | pmid=21036793 | pmc=3040598}}</ref> defined as "epidemiology of molecular pathology and heterogeneity of disease". In MPE, investigators analyze the relationships between (A) environmental, dietary, lifestyle and genetic factors; (B) alterations in cellular or extracellular molecules; and (C) evolution and progression of disease. A better understanding of heterogeneity of disease [[pathogenesis]] will further contribute to elucidate [[Etiology|etiologies]] of disease. The MPE approach can be applied to not only neoplastic diseases but also non-neoplastic diseases.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Field AE, Camargo CA, Ogino S | year = 2013 | title = The merits of subtyping obesity: one size does not fit all | journal = JAMA | volume = 310 | issue = 20| pages = 2147–48 | doi=10.1001/jama.2013.281501| pmid = 24189835 }}</ref> The concept and paradigm of MPE have become widespread in the 2010s.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Curtin K, Slattery ML, Samowitz WS | year = 2011 | title = CpG island methylation in colorectal cancer: past, present and future | journal = Pathology Research International | volume = 2011 | page = 902674 | doi = 10.4061/2011/902674 | pmid = 21559209 | pmc = 3090226 | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Hughes LA, Khalid-de Bakker CA, Smits KM, den Brandt PA, Jonkers D, Ahuja N, Herman JG, Weijenberg MP, van Engeland M|author-link6=Nita Ahuja|author-link7=James G. Herman | year = 2012 | title = The CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer: Progress and problems | journal = Biochim Biophys Acta | volume = 1825 | issue = 1| pages = 77–85 | doi=10.1016/j.bbcan.2011.10.005 | pmid=22056543|url=https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/64ca3af6-de2b-4150-b52e-0507ac49e51c}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Ku CS, Cooper DN, Wu M, Roukos DH, Pawitan Y, Soong R, Iacopetta B | year = 2012 | title = Gene discovery in familial cancer syndromes by exome sequencing: prospects for the elucidation of familial colorectal cancer type X. | journal = Mod Pathol | volume = 25 | issue = 8| pages = 1055–68 | doi=10.1038/modpathol.2012.62 | pmid=22522846| doi-access = free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Chia WK, Ali R, Toh HC | year = 2012 | title = Aspirin as adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer-reinterpreting paradigms | journal = Nat Rev Clin Oncol | volume = 9 | issue = 10| pages = 561–70 | doi=10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.137| pmid = 22910681 | s2cid = 7425809 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Spitz MR, Caporaso NE, Sellers TA | year = 2012 | title = Integrative cancer epidemiology – the next generation | journal = Cancer Discov | volume = 2 | issue = 12| pages = 1087–90 | doi=10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0424 | pmid=23230187 | pmc=3531829}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Zaidi N, Lupien L, Kuemmerle NB, Kinlaw WB, Swinnen JV, Smans K | year = 2013 | title = Lipogenesis and lipolysis: The pathways exploited by the cancer cells to acquire fatty acids | journal = Prog Lipid Res | volume = 52 | issue = 4| pages = 585–89 | doi=10.1016/j.plipres.2013.08.005| pmc = 4002264 | pmid=24001676}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Ikramuddin S, Livingston EH | year = 2013 | title = New Insights on Bariatric Surgery Outcomes | journal = JAMA | volume = 310 | issue = 22| pages = 2401–02 | doi=10.1001/jama.2013.280927| pmid = 24189645 }}</ref>{{excessive citations inline|date=March 2023}} By 2012, it was recognized that many pathogens' [[evolution]] is rapid enough to be highly relevant to epidemiology, and that therefore much could be gained from an interdisciplinary approach to infectious disease integrating epidemiology and [[molecular evolution]] to "inform control strategies, or even patient treatment."<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Little TJ, Allen JE, Babayan SA, Matthews KR, Colegrave N | year = 2012 | title = Harnessing evolutionary biology to combat infectious disease | journal = Nature Medicine | volume = 18| issue = 2| pages = 217–20 | doi=10.1038/nm.2572 | pmc=3712261 | pmid=22310693}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Pybus OG, Fraser C, Rambaut A | year = 2013 | title = Evolutionary epidemiology: preparing for an age of genomic plenty | journal = Phil Trans R Soc B | volume = 368| issue = 1614| pages = 20120193 | doi=10.1098/rstb.2012.0193| pmid = 23382418 | pmc = 3678320}}</ref> Modern epidemiological studies can use advanced statistics and [[machine learning]] to create [[Predictive modelling|predictive models]] as well as to define treatment effects.<ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094437|doi-access=free|title=Machine Learning in Epidemiology and Health Outcomes Research|year=2020|last1=Wiemken|first1=Timothy L.|last2=Kelley|first2=Robert R.|journal=Annual Review of Public Health|volume=41|pages=21–36|pmid=31577910}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|doi=10.1093/aje/kwz189|title=What is Machine Learning? A Primer for the Epidemiologist|year=2019|last1=Bi|first1=Qifang|last2=Goodman|first2=Katherine E.|last3=Kaminsky|first3=Joshua|last4=Lessler|first4=Justin|journal=American Journal of Epidemiology|volume=188|issue=12|pages=2222–2239|pmid=31509183}}</ref> There is increasing recognition that a wide range of modern data sources, many not originating from healthcare or epidemiology, can be used for epidemiological study. Such digital epidemiology can include data from internet searching, mobile phone records and retail sales of drugs.{{cn|date=November 2023}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)