Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Equivalence of categories
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Definition== Formally, given two categories ''C'' and ''D'', an ''equivalence of categories'' consists of a functor ''F'' : ''C'' β ''D'', a functor ''G'' : ''D'' β ''C'', and two natural isomorphisms Ξ΅: ''FG''β'''I'''<sub>''D''</sub> and Ξ· : '''I'''<sub>''C''</sub>β''GF''. Here ''FG'': ''D''β''D'' and ''GF'': ''C''β''C'' denote the respective compositions of ''F'' and ''G'', and '''I'''<sub>''C''</sub>: ''C''β''C'' and '''I'''<sub>''D''</sub>: ''D''β''D'' denote the ''identity functors'' on ''C'' and ''D'', assigning each object and morphism to itself. If ''F'' and ''G'' are contravariant functors one speaks of a ''duality of categories'' instead. One often does not specify all the above data. For instance, we say that the categories ''C'' and ''D'' are ''equivalent'' (respectively ''dually equivalent'') if there exists an equivalence (respectively duality) between them. Furthermore, we say that ''F'' "is" an equivalence of categories if an inverse functor ''G'' and natural isomorphisms as above exist. Note however that knowledge of ''F'' is usually not enough to reconstruct ''G'' and the natural isomorphisms: there may be many choices (see example below).
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)