Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Event-related potential
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==History== With the discovery of the [[electroencephalogram]] (EEG) in 1924, [[Hans Berger]] revealed that one could measure the electrical activity of the human brain by placing [[electrodes]] on the scalp and amplifying the signal. Changes in voltage can then be plotted over a period of time. He observed that the voltages could be influenced by external events that stimulated the senses. The EEG proved to be a useful source in recording brain activity over the ensuing decades. However, it tended to be very difficult to assess the highly specific neural process that are the focus of [[cognitive neuroscience]] because using pure EEG data made it difficult to isolate individual [[neurocognitive]] processes. Event-related potentials (ERPs) offered a more sophisticated method of extracting more specific sensory, cognitive, and motor events by using simple averaging techniques. In 1935β1936, Pauline and [[Hallowell Davis]] recorded the first known ERPs on awake humans and their findings were published a few years later, in 1939. Due to [[World War II]] not much research was conducted in the 1940s, but research focusing on sensory issues picked back up again in the 1950s. In 1964, research by [[Grey Walter]] and colleagues began the modern era of ERP component discoveries when they reported the first cognitive ERP component, called the [[contingent negative variation]] (CNV).<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Walter WG, Cooper R, Aldridge VJ, Mccallum WC, Winter AL | title = Contingent Negative Variation: An Electric Sign of Sensori-Motor Association and Expectancy in the Human Brain | journal = Nature | volume = 203 | issue = 4943 | pages = 380β4 | date = July 1964 | pmid = 14197376 | doi = 10.1038/203380a0 | s2cid = 26808780 | bibcode = 1964Natur.203..380W }}</ref> Sutton, Braren, and Zubin (1965) made another advancement with the discovery of the P3 component.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Sutton S, Braren M, Zubin J, John ER | title = Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty | journal = Science | volume = 150 | issue = 3700 | pages = 1187β8 | date = November 1965 | pmid = 5852977 | doi = 10.1126/science.150.3700.1187 | s2cid = 39822117 | bibcode = 1965Sci...150.1187S }}</ref> Over the next fifteen years, ERP component research became increasingly popular. The 1980s, with the introduction of inexpensive computers, opened up a new door for cognitive neuroscience research. Currently, ERP is one of the most widely used methods in [[cognitive neuroscience]] research to study the [[physiological]] correlates of [[Sensory perception|sensory]], [[perceptual]] and [[cognitive]] activity associated with processing information.<ref>Handy, T. C. (2005). Event Related Potentials: A Methods Handbook. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Bradford/[[MIT Press]].{{page needed|date=April 2019}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)