Editing Extinction chess (section)

==Sample game==
{{Chess diagram
|tright
|
|rd|__|bd|__|__|__|kd|__
|pd|pd|pd|__|__|pd|pd|pd
|__|__|__|__|__|nd|__|__
|__|pl|__|__|pd|__|__|__
|__|__|bl|rd|__|__|__|__
|__|__|__|__|__|__|__|__
|__|__|pl|pl|nl|pl|pl|pl
|qd|__|bl|ql|__|rl|kl|__
|Final position
}}
:[[Nomen nescio|N.N.]]–[[Fabrice Liardet]], Messigny 1998:
:'''1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. a3 e5 5. b4 Bxb4 6. axb4 Qxa1 7. Bc4 Nf6 8. Ba2? 0-0 9. Nge2 Rd8 10. Bc4 Nc6 11. b5 Nd4 12. 0-0 Nxe2 13. Nxe2 Rd4 [[Algebraic notation (chess)#End of game|0–1]]'''
White loses both bishops. Although "winning the exchange" is usually bad in Extinction Chess, the pin on the first rank in this case is very potent: White underestimated it and the Black rook's swift arrival on the d-file.{{sfnp|Pritchard|2007|p=84}}<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Beasley |first1=John |last2= |first2= |date=1999 |title=Points from near and far |url=https://www.jsbeasley.co.uk/vchess/vc31.pdf |journal=Variant Chess |volume=4 |issue=31 |pages=39 |doi= |access-date=29 September 2023}}</ref>