Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Extreme value theory
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Data analysis== Two main approaches exist for practical extreme value analysis. The first method relies on deriving block maxima (minima) series as a preliminary step. In many situations it is customary and convenient to extract the annual maxima (minima), generating an ''annual maxima series'' (AMS). The second method relies on extracting, from a continuous record, the peak values reached for any period during which values exceed a certain threshold (falls below a certain threshold). This method is generally referred to as the ''peak over threshold'' method (POT).<ref>{{cite journal | last = Leadbetter | first = M.R. | year = 1991 | title = On a basis for 'peaks over threshold' modeling | journal = Statistics and Probability Letters | volume = 12 | issue = 4| pages = 357–362 | doi = 10.1016/0167-7152(91)90107-3 }}</ref> For AMS data, the analysis may partly rely on the results of the [[Fisher–Tippett–Gnedenko theorem]], leading to the [[generalized extreme value distribution]] being selected for fitting.<ref>{{harvp|Fisher|Tippett|1928}}</ref><ref>{{harvp|Gnedenko|1943}}</ref> However, in practice, various procedures are applied to select between a wider range of distributions. The theorem here relates to the limiting distributions for the minimum or the maximum of a very large collection of [[statistical independence|independent]] [[random variable]]s from the same distribution. Given that the number of relevant random events within a year may be rather limited, it is unsurprising that analyses of observed AMS data often lead to distributions other than the ''generalized extreme value distribution'' (GEVD) being selected.<ref>{{harvp|Embrechts|Klüppelberg|Mikosch|1997}}</ref> For POT data, the analysis may involve fitting two distributions: One for the number of events in a time period considered and a second for the size of the exceedances. A common assumption for the first is the [[Poisson distribution]], with the [[generalized Pareto distribution]] being used for the exceedances. A [[Power law#Estimating the exponent from empirical data|tail-fitting]] can be based on the [[Pickands–Balkema–de Haan theorem]].<ref>{{harvp|Pickands|1975}}</ref><ref>{{harvp|Balkema|de Haan|1974}}</ref> Novak (2011) reserves the term "POT method" to the case where the threshold is non-random, and distinguishes it from the case where one deals with exceedances of a random threshold.<ref>{{harvp|Novak|2011}}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)