Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Faceted classification
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Definition == There are two primary types of classification used for information organization: enumerative and faceted. An enumerative classification contains a full set of entries for all concepts.<ref name=lcsh>{{Citation |publisher = Libraries Unlimited |isbn = 1591581540 |ol = 3311856M |location = Westport, Conn |title = Library of Congress Subject Headings |author = Chan, Lois Mai |date = 2005 |id = 1591581540 }}</ref> A faceted classification system uses a set of semantically cohesive categories that are combined as needed to create an expression of a concept. In this way, the faceted classification is not limited to already defined concepts. While this makes the classification quite flexible, it also makes the resulting expression of topics complex.<ref name=sven>{{Citation |publisher = MIT Press |isbn = 0262194333 |location = Cambridge, Mass |title = The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization |url = https://archive.org/details/intellectualfoun0000sven |author = Svenonius, Elaine |date = 2000 |id = 0262194333 |url-access = registration }}</ref> To the extent possible, facets represent "clearly defined, mutually exclusive, and collectively exhaustive aspects of a subject. The premise is that any subject or class can be analyzed into its component parts (i.e., its aspects, properties, or characteristics)."<ref name=joudrey>Joudrey, Daniel N., Arlene G. Taylor, and David P. Miller (2015). ''Introduction to Cataloging and Classification''. 11th ed. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.</ref> Some commonly used general-purpose facets are time, place, and form.<ref name=chan /> There are few purely faceted classifications; the best known of these is the [[Colon Classification]] of [[Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan]], a general knowledge classification for libraries. Some other faceted classifications are specific to special topics, such as the Art and Architecture Thesaurus and the faceted classification of occupational safety and health topics created by D. J. Foskett for the International Labour Organization.<ref name=coyle /> Many library classifications combine the enumerative and faceted classification techniques. The [[Dewey Decimal Classification]], the [[Library of Congress Classification]], and the [[Universal Decimal Classification]] all make use of facets at various points in their enumerated classification schedules. The allowed facets vary based on the subject area of the classification. These facets are recorded as tables that represent recurring types of subdivisions within subject areas. There are general facets that can be used wherever appropriate, such as geographic subdivisions of the topic. Other tables are applied only to specific areas of the schedules. Facets can be combined to create a complex subject statement.<ref name=chan /> Daniel Joudrey and Arlene Taylor describe faceted classification using an analogy: "If one thinks of each of the faces of a cut and polished diamond as a facet of the whole, one can picture a classification notation that has small notations standing for subparts of the whole topic, which are pieced together to create a complete classification notation."<ref>{{cite book|last1=Joudrey|first1=Daniel N. |last2= Taylor| first2=Arlene G.|year=2018|title=The Organization of Information|location=Santa Barbara, CA|publisher=Libraries Unlimited}}</ref> Faceted classifications exhibit many of the same problems as classifications based on a hierarchy. In particular, some concepts could belong in more than one facet, so their placement in the classification may appear to be arbitrary to the classifier. It also tends to result in a complex notation because each facet must be distinguishable as recorded.<ref name=sven />
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)