Editing Flintlock (section)

==History==
{{Further|History of gunpowder|Timeline of the gunpowder age}}
[[Image:Thomas Gainsborough - Mr and Mrs Andrews.jpg|thumb|An English gentleman {{circa|1750}} with his flintlock muzzle-loading sporting rifle, in a painting by [[Thomas Gainsborough]].]]

French court gunsmith [[Marin le Bourgeoys]] made a [[firearm]] incorporating a flintlock mechanism for King [[Louis XIII of France|Louis XIII]] shortly after his accession to the throne in 1610.<ref>''Pistols: An Illustrated History of Their Impact'' by [[Jeff Kinard]]. Published by ABC-CLIO, 2004</ref> However, firearms using some form of flint ignition mechanism had already been in use for over half a century. The first proto-flintlock was the snaplock, which was probably invented shortly before 1517 and was inarguably in use by 1547.<ref>
Arne Hoff. "What do we Really Know About the Snaphaunce?" ''The American Society of Arms Collectors Bulletin'', No. 22, (1970) pp. 11- 18. [https://sportdocbox.com/Horses/69787116-What-do-we-really-know-about-the-snaphaunce.html Transcript] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210624201623/https://sportdocbox.com/Horses/69787116-What-do-we-really-know-about-the-snaphaunce.html |date=2021-06-24 }}.</ref> Their cost and delicacy limited their use; for example around 1662, only one in six firearms used by the British royal army was a snaphaunce, the rest being matchlocks.<ref>Christopher L. Scott. ''The Maligned Militia: The West Country Militia of the Monmouth Rebellion, 1685''. Taylor and Francis: March 2016. p. 186.</ref> The development of firearm lock mechanisms had proceeded from the [[matchlock]] to [[wheellock]] to the earlier flintlocks ([[snaplock]], [[snaphance]],  [[miquelet]], and [[doglock]]) in the previous two centuries, and each type had been an improvement, contributing design features to later firearms which were useful. Le Bourgeoys fitted these various features together to create what became known as ''the'' flintlock or ''true'' flintlock.

Flintlock firearms differed from the then more common and cheaper to manufacture matchlock arms in that they were fired by the spark of the flint against the powder charge rather than by the direct application of a lighted length of cord or (as it was then called) "match". This was particularly important with men armed with muskets guarding artillery trains where a lighted cord ("match") would have been a dangerous fire hazard. Such men armed with these flintlocks were called "fusiliers" as flintlocks were then called "fusils" from the French word for such. Various types were in use by elite infantry, scouts, artillery guards (as noted), and private individuals in European armies throughout most of the 16th and 17th centuries, though matchlocks continued to overwhelmingly outnumber them.<ref>William P. Guthrie, "The Later Thirty Years War", p. 9.</ref> The early Dutch States Army used flintlocks on an unusually large scale, issuing snaphances to its infantry in the 1620s and true flintlocks by 1640. While it is known that the Dutch were the first power to adopt the flintlock as the standard infantry weapon, the exact chronology of the transition is uncertain.<ref>Guthrie, p. 187.</ref>

The new flintlock system quickly became popular and was known and used in various forms throughout Europe by 1630, although older flintlock systems continued to be used for some time. Examples of early flintlock muskets can be seen in the painting "Marie de' Medici as Bellona" by [[Rubens]] (painted around 1622–1625). These flintlocks were in use alongside older firearms such as matchlocks, wheellocks, and miquelet locks for nearly a hundred years. The last major European power to standardize the flintlock was the [[Holy Roman Empire]], when in 1702 the Emperor instituted a new regulation that all matchlocks were to be converted or scrapped.<ref>Hochedelinger, Michael. "Austria's Wars of Emergence, 1683-1797." Taylor and Francis: 2015. Page 127.</ref> The "true" flintlock was less expensive to manufacture than earlier flintlocks, which along with general economic development allowed every European soldier to have one by the 18th century. Compared to the earlier matchlock, flintlocks could be reloaded roughly twice as fast, misfired far less often, and were easier to use in various environments due to the fact that they did not require a lit match. This instantly changed the calculus of infantry combat; by one calculation, a formation equipped entirely with flintlocks (with paper cartridges) could output ten times as many shots in an equivalent period of time as a typical early 17th-century pike and shot formation equipped with matchlocks (pike:shot ratio of 3:2).<ref>Philip T. Hoffman. "Why Did Europe Conquer the World?". Princeton University Press: January 2017. Pages 56-58. The assumed ratio was 3:2 pikes to muskets.</ref>

Various breech-loading flintlocks were developed starting around 1650. The most popular action has a barrel that was unscrewed from the rest of the gun. This is more practical on pistols because of the shorter barrel length. This type is known as a [[Queen Anne pistol]] because it was during [[Anne, Queen of Great Britain|her reign]] that it became popular (although it was actually introduced in the reign of King [[William III of England|William III]]). Another type has a removable screw plug set into the side or top or bottom of the barrel. A large number of sporting rifles were made with this system, as it allowed easier loading compared with muzzle loading with a tight-fitting bullet and patch.

One of the more successful variants was the system built by Isaac de la Chaumette starting in 1704. The barrel could be opened by three revolutions of the triggerguard, to which it was attached. The plug stayed attached to the barrel and the ball and powder were loaded from the top. This system was improved in the 1770s by Colonel [[Patrick Ferguson]] and 100 experimental rifles used in the [[American Revolutionary War]]. The only two flintlock breech loaders to be produced in quantity were the Hall and the Crespi. The first was invented by [[John H. Hall (soldier)|John Hall]] and patented c. 1817.<ref>Flayderman, 1998</ref> It was issued to the U.S. Army as the [[M1819 Hall rifle|Model 1819 Hall Breech Loading Rifle]].<ref>Flayderman, 1998</ref>

The Hall rifles and carbines were loaded using a combustible [[paper cartridge]] inserted into the upward tilting breechblock. Hall rifles leaked gas from the often poorly fitted action. The same problem affected the muskets produced by Giuseppe Crespi and adopted by the Austrian Army in 1771. Nonetheless, the Crespi System was experimented with by the British during the [[Napoleonic Wars]], and percussion Halls guns saw service in the [[American Civil War]].

Flintlock weapons were commonly used until the mid 19th century, when they were replaced by [[percussion lock]] systems. Even though they have long been considered obsolete, flintlock weapons continue to be produced today by manufacturers such as Pedersoli, Euroarms, and Armi Sport. Not only are these weapons used by modern re-enactors, but they are also used for hunting, as many U.S. states have dedicated hunting seasons for black-powder weapons, which includes both flintlock and percussion lock weapons.

[[File:Flintlock Gun MET DP205762.jpg|thumb|A heavily decorated 18th-century Bondikula flintlock musket from the [[Kingdom of Kandy]] is an example of flintlock usage in Asia]]

Even after it became dominant in Europe, the flintlock did not proliferate globally. Large Flint reserves are available only in Europe and North Ameria. Flintlocks were far more complicated to manufacture than simple matchlocks, thus less-developed countries continued to use the latter into the mid 19th century, long after Europe had made the switch in the late 17th{{Fact|date=May 2025}}. In the [[Indian subcontinent]], the natively-manufactured [[toradar]] matchlock was the most common firearm type until about 1830.<ref>Gahir, Sunita; Spencer, Sharon, eds. (2006). "Weapon - A Visual History of Arms and Armor". New York City: DK Publishing. Page 260.</ref> The [[Sinhalese Kingdom]]s  locally produced flintlock mechanisms for long-barreled muskets known as the Bondikula known for its unique bifurcated butt and heavy ornamentation. These were widely used during the 17th-18th centuries.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Deraniyagala |first1=P. E. P. |title=Sinhala Weapons and Armor |journal=The Journal of the Ceylon Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland |date=1942 |volume=35 |issue=95 |pages=97–142 |jstor=45385041 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/45385041 |access-date=15 December 2021 |issn=0304-2235 |archive-date=21 November 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211121195749/https://www.jstor.org/stable/45385041 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Collecting inspiration : Edward C. Moore at Tiffany & Co. |date=2021 |publisher=MetPublications |location=New York |isbn=9781588396907 |page=185}}</ref> In China, some flintlocks had been acquired and illustrated by 1635, but they were not adopted by the army.<ref>刘旭 (2004). ''中国古代火药火器史 History of gunpowder and firearm in ancient China. 大象出版社''. p. 84. ISBN 7534730287.</ref> An 1836 British report about the Qing dynasty's military strength noted that all Chinese firearms were "ill-made" matchlocks, with no flintlocks or any of the other "tribes of firearm."<ref>[[Andrade, Tonio]] (2016). The Gunpowder Age: China, Military Innovation, and the Rise of the West in World History. Princeton University Press. Pages 240-241.</ref>

Southeast Asia was in a similar position to China and India. The Vietnamese were introduced to flintlocks by the Dutch in the 1680s, and bought some from European merchants. Flintlocks began to appear in Javanese arsenals in the first decade of the eighteenth century and the Dutch began to supply flintlocks to the rulers of Surabaya in the 1710s and 1720s. But matchlocks remained prominent until the mid-19th century, and the Southeast Asian states generally lacked the ability to natively produce the flintlock. The [[Jiaozhi arquebus]] was still the main firearm of [[Nguyễn dynasty]] musketeers at the end of the 18th century. The Burmese only obtained a majority of flintlocks in their armed forces by the 1860s (the Burmese kings demanded to be paid in surplus European muskets instead of currency), at which point the European powers had already moved on to percussion cap firearms.<ref>Charney, Michael (2004). "Southeast Asian Warfare, 1300-1900." Page 55-56, 246.</ref>