Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Ford Probe
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Background == Starting in the late 1970s, Ford and [[Carrozzeria Ghia|Ghia]] started exploring a series of futuristic designs with the "Probe" series of [[concept car|concept vehicle]]s.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20080705143355/http://www.aus-cartalk.com/probe/history.htm History of the Ford PROBE, Concept Cars]</ref> The '''Probe I''', first shown in 1979, was a wedge-shaped design that incorporated a number of drag-reducing features like covered rear wheels and pop-up headlights. This was followed the next year by a much more conventional looking '''Probe II''', whose [[hatchback]] styling was also reminiscent of the [[pony car]]s. The 1981 '''Probe III''' was an advanced demonstrator with covered wheels, but its bodywork evolved into the more conventional [[Ford Sierra]] (or [[Merkur XR4Ti]]) and styling notes that were used on the [[Ford Taurus (first generation)|Ford Taurus]].<ref>{{cite web|author=mojo1961 |url=http://www.carstyling.ru/en/cars.1981_Ford_Probe%20III.html |title=1981 Ford Probe III |publisher=Carstyling.ru |date=May 2, 2010 |access-date=July 21, 2010}}</ref> The 1983 '''Probe IV''' was a more radical concept car with a low Cd ([[drag coefficient]]), and evolved into the equally radical 1985 '''Probe V'''.<ref>{{cite web|author=Sergio |url=http://www.carstyling.ru/en/cars.1985_Ford_Probe%20V.html |title=1985 Ford Probe V (Ghia) |publisher=Carstyling.ru |date=June 10, 2008 |access-date=July 21, 2010}}</ref> After the [[1979 energy crisis]], the economic slump initiated by high fuel prices prompted [[Ford Motor Company|Ford]] to give the [[Ford Mustang]] a major redesign. The new design would be based on a totally new platform introduced to Ford by Japanese automaker [[Mazda]], who had been partnering with Ford since 1971, and whom Ford had owned a 25% stake in since 1979. Toshi Saito, a North American-based designer working for Ford, took the lead in envisioning styling directions for the front-wheel drive Mustang, and a design by Saito was chosen and finalized in early 1984. The project was then transferred to Mazda in Hiroshima, Japan and in internal Ford parlance, was referred to by the codename "ST-16".<ref>{{cite web|last1=Rosa|first1=Mike|title=Design Notes: 1989 Ford Probe|url=http://autosofinterest.com/2012/10/20/design-notes-1988-ford-probe/}}</ref> It was intended to gradually phase out the RWD Fox platform Mustang under the name "Mustang Classic" and have it eventually supplanted by the ST-16 as the "Mustang." By 1985, Mazda acquired the former Ford [[Flat Rock Assembly Plant]] (then AutoAlliance International) in [[Flat Rock, Michigan]], and intended to commence production of the two Mazda-badged GD platform cars for North America, the 626 along with the MX-6, and the ST-16, contracted by Ford, in 1987. Christopher Sawyer, writing for [[AutoWeek]] magazine, in their issue for April 13, 1987, was the first to publicly reveal the existence of the ST-16 Mustang in a sensational report that featured an artist rendering on the issue's cover of a vehicle nearly identical to what would be released as the 1989 Ford Probe GT stating "Exclusive: The '89 Mustang," along with detailed technical reports about its Mazda origins and switch to front-wheel drive. The public outcry was immediate, with many Mustang fans and [[pony car]] purists detesting the ST-16's Japanese engineering, front-wheel drive platform and lack of a V8 engine, which were anathema to traditional Mustang buyers and enthusiasts. Ford Motor Company executives, along with many car magazines received strongly-worded letters of criticism decrying the decision. Neil Ressler, the then-chief of small car engineering at Ford, spoke about the internal cultural differences at Ford Motor Company which led to a strong disagreement between two factions that had radically different notions about what the Mustang should be: {{cquote|This idea came forth that we would replace the Mustang with this front-drive car, the ST-16. There were a lot of people who thought that was a great idea—a modern car. There were also a lot of us who were appalled by that. It was like the champagne sipping crowd replaced the beer drinking crowd. The idea that we would replace the Mustang with a Japanese car—a different car from a different culture aimed at a different audience—this is not going to work.}} By 1987, [[Alex Trotman]], the newly appointed vice president in charge of Ford's North American operations, with strong urging from Ford Marketing vice president Bob Rewey, a dedicated performance enthusiast, decided that in the light of consumer outrage, the ST-16 would not make a suitable Mustang. At this point, somewhat ironically, Mustang sales, which were lackluster, grew substantially after the article's publication, out of fear that it would be the last opportunity to purchase a traditional RWD V8 Mustang. While Trotman approved the development of a RWD successor, there were many difficulties, notably that the engineering budget for the Mustang was spent on the ST-16 and Ford was still recovering from a financial crisis of the early 1980s that brought the company close to bankruptcy until the [[Ford Taurus|Taurus]] arrived. [[John Coletti]], Ford's small-car engineering manager and a vociferous opponent of the ST-16 Mustang, said of the project, "I would rather have seen the Mustang name die than put the Mustang name on the Probe ...".<ref>{{cite web|last1=Pierce|first1=Benjamin|title=How Ford Almost Ruined the Mustang|url=https://blog.americanmuscle.com/2016/10/20/how-ford-almost-ruined-the-mustang/}}</ref> Ken Dabrowski, Ford's small-car line manager, tapped Coletti to lead a [[Skunkworks project|skunkworks team]] that would develop a RWD Mustang successor with the understanding there would not be a full budget to create an entirely new car. Coletti's team heavily revised the 1979 [[Ford Fox platform|Fox platform]] for the new car, which eventually became the [[Ford Mustang (fourth generation)|fourth-generation Ford Mustang]] released for the 1994 model year. However, production for the ST-16 was about to commence, meaning Ford had to put it on sale or lose its development budget along with further potential financial headaches if Ford would break its production contract with Mazda. It was decided that the ST-16 would be released as the '''Ford Probe''' in 1988, taking the name from Ford's line of futuristic concept vehicles, and be sold alongside the Mustang, which would continue production in its then-current form with minor refreshing. Instead of being aimed as a successor to the Mustang or as a rival to its traditional competitors, the [[Chevrolet Camaro]] and [[Pontiac Firebird]],<ref>{{cite web|last1=Wernle|first1=Bradford|title=How Ford's pony car survived a brush with death|url=http://www.autonews.com/article/20140411/OEM03/304149994/how-fords-pony-car-survived-a-brush-with-death|website=[[Automotive News]]|date=April 10, 2014|access-date=March 8, 2018}}</ref> Ford would aim the Probe against popular imported sports coupes of the era such as the [[Toyota Celica]] and [[Honda Prelude]]. Both generations of the Probe were sold in Japan as Fords, at Ford/Mazda sales channels called Autorama. Japanese models were not in compliance with Japanese Government regulations concerning [[vehicle size class#Japan|exterior dimensions and engine displacement]], resulting in Japanese buyers being held liable for additional taxes as a result. The Probe was a sales success in its first model year, owing to its futuristic styling and enjoyable driving experience. In fact, demand exceeded supply in 1988, enough that buyers were paying list price or higher for a Probe, and Jim Mateja, the automotive columnist for the ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'', urged potential Probe buyers who couldn't find a Probe to consider its sibling, the Mazda MX-6.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Mateja|first1=Jim|title=If You Can't Find A Ford Probe, Try Its Cousin: Mazda's Mx-6|url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/1988/08/21/if-you-cant-find-a-ford-probe-try-its-cousin-mazdas-mx-6/|website=[[Chicago Tribune]]|date=August 21, 1988 }}</ref> Sales of the first-generation Probe were successful enough that Ford partnered with Mazda again, with further Ford engineering from the beginning of the project, to create a second-generation Probe for the 1993 model year developed alongside a second-generation Mazda MX-6. A proposed third-generation Probe, which would have been based on the [[Ford Mondeo]] instead of being Mazda-derived, was eventually released as the 1999 [[Ford Cougar|Mercury Cougar]] in the North American market to strengthen the Mercury brand. After disappointing sales of the Cougar and the waning popularity of front-wheel drive sport coupes in the late 1990s in favor of [[sport utility vehicle]]s, Ford left the market segment with the 2002 discontinuation of the Cougar, and the 2003 discontinuation of the ZX2.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)