Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Free electron model
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Ideas and assumptions== In the free electron model four main assumptions are taken into account:<ref name=":5" group="Ashcroft & Mermin">{{Harvnb|Ashcroft|Mermin|1976|pp=60}}</ref> *Free electron approximation: The interaction between the ions and the valence electrons is mostly neglected, except in boundary conditions. The ions only keep the charge neutrality in the metal. Unlike in the Drude model, the ions are not necessarily the source of collisions. *[[Independent electron approximation]]: The interactions between electrons are ignored. The electrostatic fields in metals are weak because of the [[screening effect]]. *Relaxation-time approximation: There is some unknown scattering mechanism such that the electron probability of collision is inversely proportional to the relaxation time <math>\tau</math>, which represents the average time between collisions. The collisions do not depend on the electronic configuration. *[[Pauli exclusion principle]]: Each quantum state of the system can only be occupied by a single electron. This restriction of available electron states is taken into account by [[Fermi–Dirac statistics]] (see also [[Fermi gas]]). Main predictions of the free-electron model are derived by the [[Sommerfeld expansion]] of the Fermi–Dirac occupancy for energies around the [[Fermi level]]. The name of the model comes from the first two assumptions, as each electron can be treated as [[free particle]] with a respective quadratic relation between energy and momentum. The crystal lattice is not explicitly taken into account in the free electron model, but a quantum-mechanical justification was given a year later (1928) by [[Bloch's theorem]]:<!-- Is this Bloch theorem? We must check the validity of this paragraph --> an unbound electron moves in a periodic potential as a free electron in vacuum, except for the [[electron mass]] ''m<sub>e</sub>'' becoming an [[effective mass (solid-state physics)|effective mass]] ''m*'' which may deviate considerably from ''m<sub>e</sub>'' (one can even use negative effective mass to describe conduction by [[electron hole]]s). Effective masses can be derived from [[band structure]] computations that were not originally taken into account in the free electron model.{{Cn|date=April 2024}}
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)