Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
German reunification
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Naming == [[File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-1990-1003-417, Berlin, Flaggen vor dem Reichstag.jpg|thumb|right|upright=1.35|1990 German Unity Day, with [[flags of German states|flags of all German states]] at the [[Reichstag building]] in [[Berlin]], Germany]] The term "German reunification" was given to the process of the German Democratic Republic joining the Federal Republic of Germany with full German sovereignty from the [[Allied-occupied Germany|four Allied-occupied countries]] to distinguish it from the [[Unification of Germany|process of unification of most of the German states]] into the [[German Empire]] (German Reich) led by the [[Kingdom of Prussia]] that took place from 18 August 1866 to 18 January 1871, 3 October 1990 was the day when Germany again became a single [[nation-state]]. However, for political and diplomatic reasons, West German politicians carefully avoided the term "[[reunification]]" during the runup to what Germans frequently refer to as ''[[Die Wende]]'' (roughly: "the turning point"). The 1990 treaty defines the official term as {{langx|de|Deutsche Einheit|label=none}} ("German unity");<ref name="Einigungsvertrag" /> this is commonly used in Germany. After 1990, the term {{langx|de|die Wende|label=none}} became more common. The term generally refers to the events (mostly in Eastern Europe) that led up to the actual reunification, and loosely translates to "the turning point". Anti-communist activists from Eastern Germany rejected the term {{langx|de|Wende|label=none}} as it had been introduced by the SED Secretary General [[Egon Krenz]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://1989.dra.de/ton-und-videoarchiv/archivnachweise.html?tx_weeaardra_pi2%5Bwhat%5D=031846%2C031846&tx_weeaardra_pi2%5Bfrom%5D=38&tx_weeaardra_pi2%5Bids%5D=302%2C146&tx_weeaardra_pi2%5BbackId%5D=38&cHash=ba89eab5f1|title=DRA: Archivnachweise|date=9 June 2009|access-date=5 November 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110718231606/http://1989.dra.de/ton-und-videoarchiv/archivnachweise.html?tx_weeaardra_pi2%5Bwhat%5D=031846,031846&tx_weeaardra_pi2%5Bfrom%5D=38&tx_weeaardra_pi2%5Bids%5D=302,146&tx_weeaardra_pi2%5BbackId%5D=38&cHash=ba89eab5f1|archive-date=18 July 2011|url-status=dead}}</ref> Some people have stated that the reunification can be classified as an annexation of the GDR by the FRG.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Pfeil |first=Ulrich |title=Die DDR als Zankapfel in Forschung und Politik |url=https://www.bpb.de/themen/deutschlandarchiv/307645/die-ddr-als-zankapfel-in-forschung-und-politik/ |access-date=2022-12-14 |website=bpb.de |date=9 April 2020 |language=de |archive-date=18 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230718110234/https://www.bpb.de/themen/deutschlandarchiv/307645/die-ddr-als-zankapfel-in-forschung-und-politik/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Mühlbauer |first=Peter |title=War die deutsche Wiedervereinigung eine Annexion? |url=https://www.heise.de/tp/features/War-die-deutsche-Wiedervereinigung-eine-Annexion-3369834.html |access-date=2022-12-14 |website=Telepolis |date=29 January 2015 |language=de |archive-date=14 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221214110901/https://www.heise.de/tp/features/War-die-deutsche-Wiedervereinigung-eine-Annexion-3369834.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Buchholz |first=Erich |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/427322273 |title=Totalliquidierung in zwei Akten : [juristische Annexion der DDR] |date=2009 |publisher=Homilius |isbn=978-3-89706-406-5 |location=Berlin |oclc=427322273 |access-date=6 June 2023 |archive-date=13 February 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240213042936/https://search.worldcat.org/title/427322273 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Unification or annexation? |url=https://www.dw.com/en/charges-that-unification-was-really-an-annexation-stir-up-memories/a-5962238 |access-date=2022-11-18 |website=DW |date=Sep 1, 2010 |language=en |archive-date=18 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230718105338/https://www.dw.com/en/charges-that-unification-was-really-an-annexation-stir-up-memories/a-5962238 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=1 October 2010 |first1=Oana |last1=Lungescu |title=Germany's reunification plunge |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-11447587 |access-date=2022-11-18 |archive-date=18 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230718110318/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-11447587 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=2010-08-31 |title=Reunification Controversy: Was East Germany Really 'Annexed?' |language=en |work=Der Spiegel |url=https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/reunification-controversy-was-east-germany-really-annexed-a-714826.html |access-date=2022-11-18 |issn=2195-1349 |archive-date=23 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190823150533/https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/reunification-controversy-was-east-germany-really-annexed-a-714826.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |title=Duma May Slam East German 'Annexation' |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-germany-reunification/26818112.html |access-date=2022-11-18 |newspaper=Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty |date=29 January 2015 |language=en |archive-date=18 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230718112738/https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-germany-reunification/26818112.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Scholar Ned Richardson-Little from the [[University of Erfurt]] noted that the terminology of an annexation can be interpreted from backgrounds across the political spectrum.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Ned Richardson-Little on Twitter |url=https://twitter.com/historyned/status/1529012181676834816 |access-date=2022-12-13 |website=Twitter |language=en |archive-date=13 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221213132012/https://twitter.com/historyned/status/1529012181676834816 |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2015, a Russian proposal was made that classified it as an annexation. [[Mikhail Gorbachev]] named it 'nonsense'.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Russia's bizarre proposal to condemn West Germany's 1989 'annexation' of East Germany |language=en-US |newspaper=Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/01/28/russias-bizarre-proposal-to-condemn-west-germanys-1989-annexation-of-east-germany/ |access-date=2022-11-18 |issn=0190-8286}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last= |title=Beitritt zur BRD: Vom Westen "überrannt"? {{!}} MDR.DE |url=https://www.mdr.de/geschichte/eure-geschichte/nachwendegeschichte/Vom-Westen-ueberrannt-Beitritt-DDR-in-BRD-schulprojekt-eure-geschichte-bloecher-100.html |access-date=2022-12-13 |website=[[Mitteldeutscher Rundfunk]] |language=de |archive-date=29 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230329050535/https://www.mdr.de/geschichte/eure-geschichte/nachwendegeschichte/Vom-Westen-ueberrannt-Beitritt-DDR-in-BRD-schulprojekt-eure-geschichte-bloecher-100.html |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2010, [[Matthias Platzeck]] referred to the reunification as an '[[anschluss]]'.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-05-05 |title=12 Germans who got played by Putin |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/blame-germany-russia-policy/ |access-date=2023-06-06 |website=POLITICO |language=en |archive-date=29 May 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220529010644/https://www.politico.eu/article/blame-germany-russia-policy/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)