Editing Glozel artifacts (section)

==Discovery and excavation==
{{one source|section|date=July 2015}}
[[File:Fradin dans musee.jpg|thumb|Young Émile Fradin inside his museum]]
The initial discovery was made on 1 March 1924 by 17-year-old Émile Fradin (born August 8, 1906, died February 10, 2010, age 103 <ref>{{cite news |title=Émile Fradin obituary |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/science-obituaries/7370099/Emile-Fradin.html |work=Daily Telegraph |date=4 March 2010  |access-date=  |language=en}}</ref>) and his grandfather Claude Fradin. Émile was guiding a cow-drawn plow when the cow's foot became stuck in a cavity. Freeing the cow, the Fradins uncovered an underground chamber, with walls of clay bricks and 16 clay floor tiles, containing human bones and ceramic fragments.

Adrienne Picandet, a local teacher, visited the Fradins' farm in March, and afterwards informed the Minister of Education about the site. On July 9, another teacher, Benoit Clément, visited the Fradins representing the [[Société d'émulation|Société d'Émulation du Bourbonnais]], later returning with a man called Viple. Clément and Viple used pickaxes to break down the chamber's remaining walls, which they took away with them. Later, Viple wrote to Émile Fradin identifying the site as Gallo-Roman, dating to between about A.D. 100–400, and possibly of archeological importance. The January issue of the ''Bulletin de la Société d'Émulation du Bourbonnais'' mentioned the finds, intriguing Antonin Morlet, a [[Vichy]] physician and amateur archaeologist. Morlet visited the farm on 26 April, offering 200 francs to be allowed to complete the excavation. Morlet began his excavations on 24 May 1925, discovering tablets, idols, bone and flint tools and engraved stones. Morlet identified the site as [[Neolithic]] in a report entitled ''Nouvelle Station Néolithique'' published in September 1925, with Émile Fradin listed as co-author.

Two other tombs were uncovered in 1927. More excavations were performed in April 1928. After 1941, a new law outlawed private excavations, and the site remained untouched until the Ministry of Culture re-opened excavations in 1983. The full report was never published, but a 13-page summary appeared in 1995. The authors suggest that the site is [[Middle Ages|medieval]] (roughly A.D. 500–1500), possibly containing some earlier [[Iron Age]] objects, but was likely enriched by forgeries. A group of scholars organized by [[René Germain]] held an annual [[:wikt:colloquium|colloquium]] about Glozel in Vichy from 1996 to 2009.

===Glozel affair and controversy===
[[File:Glozel-musée-2008.jpg|thumb|Glozel Museum in 2008]]
[[File:Vitrines-Glozel-2.jpg|thumb|Glozel Museum]]
French archaeological academia was dismissive of Morlet's 1925 report, published by an amateur and a peasant boy. Morlet invited a number of archaeologists to visit the site during 1926, including [[Salomon Reinach]], curator of the National Museum of [[Saint-Germain-en-Laye]], who spent three days excavating. Reinach confirmed the authenticity of the site in a communication to the [[Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres]]. Similarly, famous archaeologist [[Abbé Breuil]] excavated with Morlet and was impressed with the site, but on 2 October, Breuil wrote that "everything is false except the stoneware pottery".

At the meeting of the International Institute of Anthropology in Amsterdam, held in September 1927, Glozel was the subject of heated controversy. A commission was appointed for further investigation, arriving at Glozel on 5 November 1927. During their three-day excavation campaign, the archaeologists were observed by spectators, who were by now flocking to the site, finding various artifacts, but in their report of December 1927, the commission declared everything at Glozel with the exception of a few pieces of flint axes and stone were fake. [[René Dussaud]], curator at the [[Louvre]] and famous epigrapher, also accused Émile Fradin of forgery. On 8 January 1928, Fradin filed suit for defamation against Dussaud.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.museedeglozel.com/1928.htm|title=Glozel, l'année 1928|publisher=Musée de Glozel |accessdate=17 January 2009|language=fr}}</ref>

[[Felix Regnault]], the president of the French Prehistoric Society, visited Glozel on 24 February 1928. After briefly visiting the site's small museum, he filed a complaint of fraud. On 25 February, the police, under the direction of Regnault, searched the museum, destroyed glass display cases and confiscated three cases of artifacts. On 28 February the suit against Dussaud was postponed due to Regnault's pending indictment against Fradin. A new group of neutral archaeologists, called the Committee of Studies, was appointed by scholars who were uncomfortable with the ongoing controversy.  They concluded that "that the whole of Glozel
was a fake".<ref>{{cite journal |last1 = Garrod |first1 = D. |title=Recollections of Glozel |journal=Antiquity |date=1968 |volume=42 |issue=167 |pages=172–177 |doi=10.1017/S0003598X00034268 | url = https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/86E7E962C0B5DBD3593C07B815253A6B/S0003598X00034268a.pdf/recollections_of_glozel.pdf|access-date=  |language=en }}</ref>

Excavating from 12 to 14 April 1928, they found more artifacts, and in their report asserted the authenticity of the site, which they identified as Neolithic. Gaston-Edmond Bayle, chief of the Criminal Records Office in Paris, analyzed the confiscated artifacts. Bayle's report identified the artifacts as recent forgeries, and on 4 June 1929, Émile Fradin was indicted for fraud on the basis of Bayle's report. The verdict against Fradin was reverted by an appeal court in April 1931. The defamation charge against Dussaud came to trial in March 1932, and Dussaud was found guilty of defamation.<ref>{{cite web |url = http://www.museedeglozel.com/Corpus/ProcFrad.pdf |title = Tribunal correctionnel de la Seine |language = French |publisher = Musée de Glozel |accessdate = July 16, 2015}}</ref>