Editing Hugh Loebner (section)

== Loebner prize==

Loebner established the [[Loebner Prize]] in 1990. He pledged to give $100,000 and a solid gold medal to the first programmer able to write a program whose communicative behavior can fool humans into thinking that the program is human. The competition has been repeated annually and has been hosted by various organizations. Within the field of [[artificial intelligence]], the Loebner Prize is somewhat controversial; the most prominent critic, [[Marvin Minsky]], has called it a [[publicity stunt]] that does not help the field along.

Loebner also liked to point out that, unlike the solid gold medal for the Loebner prize, the [[gold medal]]s of the [[Olympic Games]] are not solid [[gold]], but are made of [[silver]] covered with a thin layer of gold.<ref name=salon>[http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2003/02/26/loebner_part_one/ Artificial stupidity] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100127205555/http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2003/02/26/loebner_part_one |date=2010-01-27 }}, ''Salon.com'', 16 February 2003</ref>

Fascinated by Alan Turing's imitation game, and considering creating a system himself to pass it, Loebner realized that even if he were to succeed in developing a computer that could pass the [[Turing test]], no avenue existed in which to prove it.

In his letter to Dr. Robert Epstein, written on December 30, 1988 [http://drrobertepstein.com/], Loebner authorized Dr. Epstein to move forward with a contest, and referring to the Turing Test, Loebner wrote: "Robert, in years to come, there may be richer prizes, and more prestigious contests, but gads, this will always be the oldest." Establishing the Loebner Prize, he introduced the Turing Test to a wider public, and stimulated interest in this science. It remains Hugh Loebner’s desire to advance AI, and for the Turing Test to serve as a tool to measure the state of the art: "There is a nobility in this endeavour. If we humans can succeed in developing an artificial intellect it will be a measure of the scope of our intellect" (from: ''In Response'', 1994) [http://loebner.net/Prizef/In-response.html] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080314154148/http://loebner.net/Prizef/In-response.html |date=2008-03-14 }}.