Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Inclosure act
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==History== {{further|Enclosure}} Before the enclosures in England, a portion of the land was categorized as "common" or "waste".{{efn|The [[Domesday Book]] records various manors as waste (Latin: ''vasta, wasta''). Holdings described as waste or not in use paid no tax.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Waste |url=http://www.domesdaybook.net/domesday-book/data-terminology/taxation/waste |publisher=Hull Domesday project |access-date=22 August 2019}}</ref>}} "Common" land was under the control of the lord of the manor, but certain rights on the land such as [[pasture]], [[pannage]], or [[estovers]] were held variously by certain nearby properties, or (occasionally) ''in gross'' by all manorial tenants. "Waste" was land without value as a farm strip – often very narrow areas (typically less than a yard wide) in awkward locations (such as cliff edges, or inconveniently shaped manorial borders), but also bare rock, and similar. "Waste" was not officially used by anyone, and so was often farmed by landless peasants.<ref name=Clark>{{Cite journal |last=Clark |first=Gregory |author2=Anthony Clark |title=Common Rights to Land in England |journal=The Journal of Economic History |date=December 2001| volume=61| issue=4| pages=1009–1036 |doi=10.1017/S0022050701042061 |s2cid=154462400 |url=http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=104888&jid=JEH&volumeId=61&issueId=04&aid=104887&bodyId=&membershipNumber=&societyETOCSession= |access-date=12 December 2013|url-access=subscription }}</ref> The remaining land was organised into a large number of narrow strips, each tenant possessing a number of disparate strips throughout the manor, as would the [[lord of the manor|manorial lord]]. Called the [[open-field system]], it was administered by [[court baron|manorial courts]], which exercised some collective control.<ref name=Clark/> What might now be termed a single field would have been divided under this system among the lord and his tenants; poorer peasants ([[serfdom|serfs]] or [[copyhold|copyholders]], depending on the era) were allowed to live on the strips owned by the lord in return for cultivating his land.<ref name=EB>{{Cite encyclopedia |title=open-field system |url=http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/429652/open-field-system/ |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica Inc. |access-date=12 December 2013}}</ref> The system facilitated common grazing and [[crop rotation]].<ref name=EB/> Any individual might possess several strips of land within the manor, often at some distance from one another. Seeking better financial returns, landowners looked for more efficient farming techniques.{{sfn|Motamed|Florax|Masters|2014|pages=339-368}} Enclosure acts for small areas had been passed sporadically since the 12th century, but advances in agricultural knowledge and technology in the 18th century made them more commonplace. Because tenants, or even copyholders, had legally enforceable rights on the land, substantial compensation was provided to extinguish them; thus many tenants were active supporters of enclosure, though it enabled landlords to force reluctant tenants to comply with the process. With legal control of the land, landlords introduced innovations in methods of crop production, increasing profits and supporting the [[British Agricultural Revolution|Agricultural Revolution]]; higher productivity also enabled landowners to justify higher rents for the people working the land. The powers granted in the [[Inclosure Act 1773]] ([[13 Geo. 3]]. c. 81) of the [[Parliament of Great Britain]] were often abused by landowners: the preliminary meetings where enclosure was discussed, intended to be held in public, often took place in the presence of only the local landowners, who regularly chose their own solicitors, surveyors and commissioners to decide on each case. In 1786 there were still 250,000 independent landowners, but in the course of only thirty years their number was reduced to 32,000.<ref>https://libcom.org/files/Rocker%20-%20Anarcho-Syndicalism%20Theory%20and%20Practice.pdf, p. 36.</ref> The tenants displaced by the process often left the countryside to work in the towns. This contributed to the [[Industrial Revolution]] – at the very moment new technological advances required large numbers of workers, a concentration of large numbers of people in need of work had emerged; the former country tenants and their descendants became workers in industrial factories within cities.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Enclosing the Land |url=http://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/towncountry/landscape/overview/enclosingland/ |access-date=12 December 2013}}</ref> The [[Inclosure (Consolidation) Act 1801]] ([[41 Geo. 3. (U.K.)]] c. 109) was passed to tidy up previous acts. The [[Inclosure Act 1845]] ([[8 & 9 Vict.]] c. 118) instituted the appointment of Inclosure Commissioners, who could enclose land without submitting a request to Parliament.
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)