Open main menu
Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Incubator escapee wiki
Search
User menu
Talk
Dark mode
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Incubator escapee wiki:Featured article candidates/Cascading Style Sheets/archive1
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===[[Cascading Style Sheets]]=== I was pleasantly surprised to find this much information on CSS here, and thought it looked like a featured article. [[User:Grendelkhan|grendel]]|[[User_talk:Grendelkhan|khan]] 18:41, 2005 Feb 9 (UTC) * Object. Not ready for featured status. Has no lead section, no images (yes I think these are possibly for this article), and about a quarter of the article consists of external links, many of which are duplicate or irrelevant. The article should also be clear on whether it is an article about CSS or an article for people who want to use it. There are various more smaller problems which I will not dicuss here now; I suggest to move this article [[Wikipedia:Peer Review]] before coming back here. [[User:Jeronimo|Jeronimo]] 19:09, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC) * '''Refer to Peer Review'''. In addition to Jeronimo's points: I think the article should include more info on the content of the CSS(2) specifications. Also, keywords are mentioned but not explained ('aural', 'paged'). Content is duplicated (e.g. the part about the nature of CSS2.1 is found in both the 'Difficulty with adoption' and 'Recommendations' sections). The distinction (if any) between 'recommendation' and 'specification' is not clear. The important issue of accessibility is touched upon only in tutorial style. [[User:Mark Dingemanse|<nowiki> </nowiki>]]— [[User:Mark Dingemanse|mark]] [[User Talk:Mark Dingemanse|✎]] 00:26, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC) *agree with everything said so far. '''Object''' its not yet ready for FA status. I would also like to point out theres nothing on the CSS 3.0 standard proposal and what its going to break/fix. [[User:Alkivar|<span style="color:#FA8605;">'''ALKIVAR'''</span>]]™[[Image:Radioactive.svg|18px|]] 01:27, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC) *'''Refer to peer review''' - lead section too short. Not enough about incompatiblities (yes, I realise there are external links, but this should be noted in the article text itself) we have an article [[Internet Explorer box model bug]] for instance, [[User:WapCaplet]] noted in the talk page that "stylesheets were originally envisioned by [[Tim Berners-Lee]] in about 1994, and how they progressed over time to become a standard" and that there should be "some mention of the difficulties in getting the standards widely accepted and used in practice, and particularly in getting browsers to implement them". No information about the differences between CSS1, CSS2 and CSS3. More information about sites like CSS ZenGarden might be nice also. - [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]] 04:30, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC) *'''Comment''': Some discussion of advanced CSS syntax, like a[href ^="http://"]. —[[{{ns:2}}:Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason|Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason]] 05:59, 2005 Feb 10 (UTC)
Edit summary
(Briefly describe your changes)
By publishing changes, you agree to the
Terms of Use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 4.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)